Intraday BUY SELL Signals
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EATZ vs FAT
EATZ vs FAT Comparison
Open Charts EATZ vs FAT
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
Price$27.39
Change+$0.29 (+1.07%)
Volume$2.83K
Net Assets2.61M
EATZ vs FAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EATZ vs. FAT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EATZ is a Hold and FAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EATZ | FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EATZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EATZ has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EATZ jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EATZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EATZ | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| CAVA - EATZ | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| BROS - EATZ | 50% Loosely correlated | -4.09% | ||
| YUMC - EATZ | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| RICK - EATZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| FAT - EATZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -22.57% | ||
More | ||||
FAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with FATBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then FATBB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAT | 100% | -22.57% | ||
| FATBB - FAT | 41% Loosely correlated | +15.87% | ||
| FATBP - FAT | 32% Poorly correlated | -13.72% | ||
| DIN - FAT | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| CNNE - FAT | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
| SBUX - FAT | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||