EATBF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.14M
JTCPF
Price
$12.21
Change
-$0.79 (-6.08%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
Ad is loading...

EATBF vs JTCPF

Header iconEATBF vs JTCPF Comparison
Open Charts EATBF vs JTCPFBanner chart's image
EAT & BEYOND GLOBAL
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$145
Capitalization10.14M
JTC
Price$12.21
Change-$0.79 (-6.08%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization1.48B
EATBF vs JTCPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EATBF vs. JTCPF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EATBF is a Hold and JTCPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (EATBF: $0.10 vs. JTCPF: $13.00)
Brand notoriety: EATBF and JTCPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EATBF: 2% vs. JTCPF: 20%
Market capitalization -- EATBF: $10.14M vs. JTCPF: $1.48B
EATBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $10.14M. JTCPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EATBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJTCPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EATBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JTCPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EATBF and JTCPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

EATBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -11.87% price change this week, while JTCPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.68% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JTCPF($1.48B) has a higher market cap than EATBF($10.1M). EATBF YTD gains are higher at: 0.505 vs. JTCPF (0.000).
EATBFJTCPFEATBF / JTCPF
Capitalization10.1M1.48B1%
EBITDAN/A38M-
Gain YTD0.5050.000-
P/E RatioN/A32.05-
RevenueN/A174M-
Total CashN/A60.9M-
Total DebtN/A197M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

EATBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EATBF and PIAC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EATBF and PIAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EATBF
1D Price
Change %
EATBF100%
N/A
PIAC - EATBF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JTCPF - EATBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGGF - EATBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSEN - EATBF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRNF - EATBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JTCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JTCPF and EATBF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JTCPF and EATBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JTCPF
1D Price
Change %
JTCPF100%
N/A
EATBF - JTCPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCSF - JTCPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDG - JTCPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
OFSTF - JTCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.14%
ELRNF - JTCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More