EAT
Price
$180.05
Change
-$1.73 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8B
46 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$138.48
Change
+$0.06 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.57B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAT vs SHAK

Header iconEAT vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$180.05
Change-$1.73 (-0.95%)
Volume$1.9M
Capitalization8B
Shake Shack
Price$138.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.04%)
Volume$1.71M
Capitalization5.57B
EAT vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. SHAK commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Buy and SHAK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EAT: $180.05 vs. SHAK: $138.48)
Brand notoriety: EAT: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 118% vs. SHAK: 115%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $8B vs. SHAK: $5.57B
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $8B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $5.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was +4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($8B) has a higher market cap than SHAK($5.57B). SHAK has higher P/E ratio than EAT: SHAK (477.52) vs EAT (25.04). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 36.103 vs. SHAK (6.687). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 637M vs. SHAK (125M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 313M vs. EAT (17.5M). SHAK has less debt than EAT: SHAK (824M) vs EAT (1.72B). EAT has higher revenues than SHAK: EAT (5.13B) vs SHAK (1.28B).
EATSHAKEAT / SHAK
Capitalization8B5.57B144%
EBITDA637M125M510%
Gain YTD36.1036.687540%
P/E Ratio25.04477.525%
Revenue5.13B1.28B400%
Total Cash17.5M313M6%
Total Debt1.72B824M209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6980
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1245
SMR RATING
1..100
1087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAT's Valuation (78) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SHAK (97). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHAK (45). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHAK (87). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SHAK (39). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (38). This means that SHAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FPXE31.060.65
+2.14%
First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opps ETF
BRKU25.040.04
+0.16%
Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X Shares
FJAN47.420.07
+0.15%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jan
DDIV37.940.04
+0.11%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF
NAPR50.970.04
+0.08%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with TXRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then TXRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
-0.95%
TXRH - EAT
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
DENN - EAT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
SHAK - EAT
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
DRI - EAT
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
CAKE - EAT
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
+0.04%
CAKE - SHAK
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
TXRH - SHAK
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
CAVA - SHAK
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
EAT - SHAK
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
KRUS - SHAK
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
More