EAT
Price
$144.87
Change
-$8.66 (-5.64%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.43B
65 days until earnings call
SBUX
Price
$111.75
Change
-$1.59 (-1.40%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
126.94B
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EAT vs SBUX

Header iconEAT vs SBUX Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs SBUXBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$144.87
Change-$8.66 (-5.64%)
Volume$2.02M
Capitalization6.43B
Starbucks
Price$111.75
Change-$1.59 (-1.40%)
Volume$9.66M
Capitalization126.94B
EAT vs SBUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. SBUX commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Hold and SBUX is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (EAT: $144.87 vs. SBUX: $111.75)
Brand notoriety: EAT: Not notable vs. SBUX: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 151% vs. SBUX: 97%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $6.43B vs. SBUX: $126.94B
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $6.43B. SBUX’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $126.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $218.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSBUX’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SBUX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBUX is a better buy in the long-term than EAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBUX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SBUX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBUX is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -8.54% price change this week, while SBUX (@Restaurants) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

SBUX is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.35% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBUX($127B) has a higher market cap than EAT($6.43B). SBUX has higher P/E ratio than EAT: SBUX (36.05) vs EAT (25.19). SBUX YTD gains are higher at: 23.130 vs. EAT (9.509). EAT has less debt than SBUX: EAT (1.86B) vs SBUX (25.9B).
EATSBUXEAT / SBUX
Capitalization6.43B127B5%
EBITDA538MN/A-
Gain YTD9.50923.13041%
P/E Ratio25.1936.0570%
Revenue4.83BN/A-
Total Cash14.8MN/A-
Total Debt1.86B25.9B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs SBUX: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
SBUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6327
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1251
SMR RATING
1..100
511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3512
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBUX's Valuation (28) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (85). This means that SBUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBUX (51). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (11). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (35). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (17). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATSBUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96258.000000-319.757800
-0.33%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been closely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
-5.64%
CAKE - EAT
69%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
DENN - EAT
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.11%
CBRL - EAT
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
BJRI - EAT
41%
Loosely correlated
+6.46%
WING - EAT
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.29%
More

SBUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBUX and JACK have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBUX and JACK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBUX
1D Price
Change %
SBUX100%
-1.40%
JACK - SBUX
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
EAT - SBUX
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.64%
YUM - SBUX
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
BPZZF - SBUX
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSR - SBUX
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More