EAT
Price
$159.06
Change
+$3.20 (+2.05%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.08B
55 days until earnings call
QSR
Price
$62.41
Change
-$0.09 (-0.14%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.54B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAT vs QSR

Header iconEAT vs QSR Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs QSRBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$159.06
Change+$3.20 (+2.05%)
Volume$1.35M
Capitalization7.08B
Restaurant Brands International
Price$62.41
Change-$0.09 (-0.14%)
Volume$2.24M
Capitalization20.54B
EAT vs QSR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. QSR commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a StrongBuy and QSR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EAT: $159.06 vs. QSR: $62.41)
Brand notoriety: EAT and QSR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 105% vs. QSR: 102%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $7.08B vs. QSR: $20.54B
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.08B. QSR’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $20.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $225.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQSR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QSR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EAT and QSR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QSR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than QSR.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

QSR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.54% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QSR($20.5B) has a higher market cap than EAT($7.08B). QSR has higher P/E ratio than EAT: QSR (23.55) vs EAT (19.12). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 20.236 vs. QSR (-2.310). QSR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.44B vs. EAT (720M). QSR has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. EAT (18.9M). EAT has less debt than QSR: EAT (1.69B) vs QSR (16B). QSR has higher revenues than EAT: QSR (9.11B) vs EAT (5.38B).
EATQSREAT / QSR
Capitalization7.08B20.5B35%
EBITDA720M2.44B30%
Gain YTD20.236-2.310-876%
P/E Ratio19.1223.5581%
Revenue5.38B9.11B59%
Total Cash18.9M1.03B2%
Total Debt1.69B16B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs QSR: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
QSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
788
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1855
SMR RATING
1..100
1135
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4578
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6120
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (24) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (74). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSR (55). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSR’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (35). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSR (78). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (61). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATQSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDEX60.990.31
+0.51%
ONEFUND S&P 500®
CHFGBP0.93N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - United Kingdom Pound
USDCNY7.15N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - China Yuan
EURRUB93.71N/A
N/A
Euro - Russia Ruble
JPYAUD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - Australian Dollar

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
+2.05%
SHAK - EAT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
TXRH - EAT
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
CAKE - EAT
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
DRI - EAT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
CAVA - EAT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
More

QSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSR
1D Price
Change %
QSR100%
-1.31%
YUM - QSR
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
MCD - QSR
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
DPZ - QSR
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
WEN - QSR
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
EAT - QSR
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More