EAT
Price
$127.35
Change
-$6.42 (-4.80%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
41 days until earnings call
PBPB
Price
$9.03
Change
-$0.53 (-5.54%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EAT vs PBPB

Header iconEAT vs PBPB Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs PBPBBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$127.35
Change-$6.42 (-4.80%)
Volume$1.44M
CapitalizationN/A
Potbelly
Price$9.03
Change-$0.53 (-5.54%)
Volume$157.19K
CapitalizationN/A
EAT vs PBPB Comparison Chart
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. PBPB commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Hold and PBPB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (EAT: $127.35 vs. PBPB: $9.03)
Brand notoriety: EAT and PBPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 112% vs. PBPB: 109%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $5.66B vs. PBPB: $270.03M
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $5.66B. PBPB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $270.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePBPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PBPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than PBPB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBPB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PBPB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while PBPB (@Restaurants) price change was -8.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

PBPB is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-5.24% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($5.66B) has a higher market cap than PBPB($270M). EAT has higher P/E ratio than PBPB: EAT (31.21) vs PBPB (7.22). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 194.928 vs. PBPB (-13.340).
EATPBPBEAT / PBPB
Capitalization5.66B270M2,096%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD194.928-13.340-1,461%
P/E Ratio31.217.22433%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.03BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs PBPB: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
PBPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7455
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1950
SMR RATING
1..100
819
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBPB's Valuation (85) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (97). This means that PBPB’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (50). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (19). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (47). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBPB (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATPBPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been closely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
-4.80%
CAKE - EAT
69%
Closely correlated
-5.60%
DENN - EAT
58%
Loosely correlated
-8.47%
CBRL - EAT
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
BJRI - EAT
43%
Loosely correlated
-6.59%
PTLO - EAT
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
More

PBPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBPB has been loosely correlated with RRGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBPB jumps, then RRGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBPB
1D Price
Change %
PBPB100%
-5.54%
RRGB - PBPB
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.95%
RICK - PBPB
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
DENN - PBPB
34%
Loosely correlated
-8.47%
BLMN - PBPB
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
EAT - PBPB
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
More