EAPIF
Price
$3.09
Change
-$0.56 (-15.34%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
345.75M
HLUBF
Price
$4.59
Change
-$0.15 (-3.16%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAPIF vs HLUBF

Header iconEAPIF vs HLUBF Comparison
Open Charts EAPIF vs HLUBFBanner chart's image
EUROAPI SA
Price$3.09
Change-$0.56 (-15.34%)
Volume$292
Capitalization345.75M
H. Lundbeck A/S
Price$4.59
Change-$0.15 (-3.16%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.86B
EAPIF vs HLUBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAPIF vs. HLUBF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAPIF is a Hold and HLUBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EAPIF: $3.09 vs. HLUBF: $4.59)
Brand notoriety: EAPIF and HLUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAPIF: 20% vs. HLUBF: 22%
Market capitalization -- EAPIF: $345.75M vs. HLUBF: $5.86B
EAPIF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $345.75M. HLUBF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $5.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAPIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLUBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EAPIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLUBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLUBF is a better buy in the long-term than EAPIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAPIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLUBF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAPIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HLUBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EAPIF and HLUBF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EAPIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLUBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+6.26% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLUBF($5.86B) has a higher market cap than EAPIF($346M). HLUBF (8.31) and EAPIF (7.92) have similar P/E ratio . HLUBF YTD gains are higher at: 3.612 vs. EAPIF (2.890). HLUBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.71B vs. EAPIF (-34.7M). HLUBF has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. EAPIF (73M). EAPIF has less debt than HLUBF: EAPIF (69.1M) vs HLUBF (16.7B). HLUBF has higher revenues than EAPIF: HLUBF (22B) vs EAPIF (919M).
EAPIFHLUBFEAPIF / HLUBF
Capitalization346M5.86B6%
EBITDA-34.7M5.71B-1%
Gain YTD2.8903.61280%
P/E Ratio7.928.3195%
Revenue919M22B4%
Total Cash73M4.66B2%
Total Debt69.1M16.7B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAPIFHLUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYCH25.04N/A
N/A
SPDR SSGA My2028 Corporate Bond ETF
BSMW24.50-0.01
-0.04%
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Muncpl Bd ETF
GDV26.45-0.03
-0.11%
Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust (The)
DFEB45.65-0.11
-0.24%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb
BWTG37.05-0.09
-0.25%
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF

EAPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAPIF and ALVO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAPIF and ALVO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAPIF
1D Price
Change %
EAPIF100%
N/A
ALVO - EAPIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
AKAN - EAPIF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLSH - EAPIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLSH - EAPIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STEK - EAPIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More

HLUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLUBF and HLBBF have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLUBF and HLBBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLUBF
1D Price
Change %
HLUBF100%
N/A
HLBBF - HLUBF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNCF - HLUBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
ESAIY - HLUBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
EAPIF - HLUBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGLAF - HLUBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More