Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EALCX vs RGEBX
EALCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts EALCX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Growth A
Price$40.39
Change-$6.90 (-14.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.57M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
EALCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EALCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EALCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. EALCX (439M). EALCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . EALCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: EALCX (23 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) and EALCX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EALCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EALCX: RGEBX (250) vs EALCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. EALCX (-3.33). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. EALCX (7.85).
| EALCX | RGEBX | EALCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.08 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.08 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.156 | -1.057 | 204% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.33 | 1.80 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.65 | 41.63 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.85 | 9.88 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.98 | 110.02 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement