Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EALCX vs RGAHX
EALCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EALCX vs RGAHX
Eaton Vance Growth A
Price$40.39
Change-$6.90 (-14.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.57M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
EALCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EALCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EALCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. EALCX (439M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EALCX: RGAHX (0.43) vs EALCX (0.00). EALCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EALCX (23 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EALCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EALCX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EALCX: RGAHX (250) vs EALCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. EALCX (-3.33). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. EALCX (7.85).
| EALCX | RGAHX | EALCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.44 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.44 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.156 | -1.010 | 214% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.33 | 2.79 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.65 | 45.40 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.85 | 13.96 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.98 | 119.50 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement