Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFGX vs RGACX
EAFGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EAFGX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps A
Price$30.12
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.82M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
EAFGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. EAFGX (121M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EAFGX: RGACX (0.07) vs EAFGX (0.00). EAFGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EAFGX (15 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EAFGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EAFGX (23.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFGX: RGACX (250) vs EAFGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. EAFGX (9.97). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. EAFGX (11.64).
| EAFGX | RGACX | EAFGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.94 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.308 | 17.183 | 66% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 12.22 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.90 | 71.26 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.64 | 45.63 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.11 | 111.15 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement