Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAEAX vs RGWBX
EAEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EAEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc A
Price$39.35
Change-$0.15 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets857.13M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$28.19
Change-$0.20 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
EAEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAEAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. EAEAX (857M). EAEAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EAEAX (0.42) vs RGWBX (0.00). EAEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EAEAX (24 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). EAEAX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAEAX: RGWBX (250) vs EAEAX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.10 vs. EAEAX (10.19). EAEAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.14 vs. RGWBX (22.99).
| EAEAX | RGWBX | EAEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.46 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.46 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.864 | 2.286 | 82% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 857M | 25.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.19 | 16.10 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.47 | 56.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.14 | 22.99 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.78 | 116.53 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement