Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACPX vs RGAHX
EACPX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGAHX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$61.75
Change+$0.19 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.84M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
EACPX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. EACPX (156M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EACPX: RGAHX (0.47) vs EACPX (0.00). EACPX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EACPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGAHX (250) vs EACPX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. EACPX (12.40). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 63.06 vs. RGAHX (49.57).
| EACPX | RGAHX | EACPX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.44 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.44 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.214 | 13.426 | 39% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.40 | 17.89 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.62 | 58.90 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.06 | 49.57 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.68 | N/A | - |