Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACPX vs RGAHX
EACPX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGAHX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$63.22
Change-$1.12 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.9M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
EACPX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. EACPX (167M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EACPX: RGAHX (0.44) vs EACPX (0.00). EACPX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EACPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGAHX (250) vs EACPX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. EACPX (3.47). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 47.64 vs. RGAHX (40.79).
| EACPX | RGAHX | EACPX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.44 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.44 | 280% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.719 | 19.894 | 39% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 9.02 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.51 | 65.43 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.64 | 40.79 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement