Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACPX vs RGACX
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$62.86
Change+$0.28 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. EACPX (161M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EACPX: RGACX (0.07) vs EACPX (0.00). EACPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EACPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGACX (250) vs EACPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. EACPX (8.34). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 57.27 vs. RGACX (45.63).
| EACPX | RGACX | EACPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.105 | 17.183 | 41% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | 12.22 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.63 | 71.26 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.27 | 45.63 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.91 | 111.15 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement