Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACPX vs RGACX
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$62.80
Change+$0.29 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.41M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. EACPX (163M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EACPX: RGACX (0.07) vs EACPX (0.00). EACPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EACPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGACX (250) vs EACPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. EACPX (6.88). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 48.32 vs. RGACX (37.85).
| EACPX | RGACX | EACPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.003 | 17.655 | 40% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 11.01 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.71 | 70.57 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.32 | 37.85 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.00 | 96.78 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement