Advertisement
EACO vs RXLSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACO is a StrongBuy and RXLSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EACO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRXLSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EACO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RXLSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EACO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RXLSF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EACO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RXLSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EACO (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) experienced а +7.78% price change this week, while RXLSF (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliance Stores industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliance Stores (-1.10% weekly)The electronics/appliance stores industry includes companies that sell consumer electronics such as computers, stereo components, software, TVs, and appliances such as those for cooking and cleaning. Some companies also operate stores that rent and sell pre-recorded CDs and DVDs. Best Buy Co., Inc., Conn’s, Inc., Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores Inc. and Trans World Entertainment Corp. are some of the largest companies in this space.
| EACO | RXLSF | EACO / RXLSF | |
| Capitalization | 394M | 10.4B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 42.9M | 1.24B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 121.918 | 38.126 | 320% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.29 | 35.81 | 34% |
| Revenue | 402M | 19.4B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 29.3M | 439M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 11.6M | 4.81B | 0% |
EACO | RXLSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 49 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RXLSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EACO (59). This means that RXLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EACO’s over the last 12 months.
EACO's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as RXLSF (17). This means that EACO’s stock grew similarly to RXLSF’s over the last 12 months.
EACO's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RXLSF (95). This means that EACO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RXLSF’s over the last 12 months.
EACO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RXLSF (44). This means that EACO’s stock grew similarly to RXLSF’s over the last 12 months.
RXLSF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EACO (47). This means that RXLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EACO’s over the last 12 months.
| EACO | RXLSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 28% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BITI | 20.38 | 0.25 | +1.24% |
| ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | |||
| DJD | 57.17 | 0.36 | +0.63% |
| Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Avg Div ETF | |||
| BNGE | 38.93 | -0.06 | -0.16% |
| First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF | |||
| BCI | 22.68 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| abrdn Blmb AllCmdStrK1Fr ETF | |||
| IYRI | 49.63 | -0.30 | -0.60% |
| NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | |||
EACO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EACO and RXLSF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EACO and RXLSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EACO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EACO | 100% | N/A | ||
| RXLSF - EACO | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPRS - EACO | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RXEEY - EACO | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.29% | ||
| IZM - EACO | 1% Poorly correlated | -20.86% | ||
| SKSJF - EACO | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RXLSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RXLSF and RXEEY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RXLSF and RXEEY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RXLSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RXLSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RXEEY - RXLSF | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.29% | ||
| ARW - RXLSF | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| PGNT - RXLSF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSIT - RXLSF | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
| AVT - RXLSF | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||