EAATF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
3.72M
SECYF
Price
$11.94
Change
+$0.03 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAATF vs SECYF

Header iconEAATF vs SECYF Comparison
Open Charts EAATF vs SECYFBanner chart's image
Earthworks Industries
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60K
Capitalization3.72M
SECURE WASTE INFRASTRUCTURE
Price$11.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
Volume$20.57K
Capitalization2.64B
EAATF vs SECYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAATF vs. SECYF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAATF is a Hold and SECYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EAATF: $0.02 vs. SECYF: $11.94)
Brand notoriety: EAATF and SECYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAATF: 341% vs. SECYF: 65%
Market capitalization -- EAATF: $3.72M vs. SECYF: $2.64B
EAATF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $3.72M. SECYF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $2.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAATF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSECYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EAATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SECYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the long-term than EAATF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAATF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAATF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SECYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the short-term than EAATF.

Price Growth

EAATF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SECYF (@Environmental Services) price change was -0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.39% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SECYF($2.64B) has a higher market cap than EAATF($3.73M). SECYF has higher P/E ratio than EAATF: SECYF (18.10) vs EAATF (2.26). SECYF YTD gains are higher at: 5.804 vs. EAATF (-40.236). SECYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 428M vs. EAATF (-14.27M). SECYF has more cash in the bank: 31M vs. EAATF (50.6K). EAATF has less debt than SECYF: EAATF (1.77M) vs SECYF (1.01B). SECYF has higher revenues than EAATF: SECYF (10.3B) vs EAATF (0).
EAATFSECYFEAATF / SECYF
Capitalization3.73M2.64B0%
EBITDA-14.27M428M-3%
Gain YTD-40.2365.804-693%
P/E Ratio2.2618.1012%
Revenue010.3B-
Total Cash50.6K31M0%
Total Debt1.77M1.01B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAATF vs SECYF: Fundamental Ratings
EAATF
SECYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
10043
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1005
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAATF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SECYF (50). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to SECYF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAATF (91). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAATFSECYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTGCX35.460.35
+1.00%
BNY Mellon Technology Growth C
RIRCX78.550.40
+0.51%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R3
RTXSX13.200.05
+0.38%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets S
MMELX16.510.06
+0.36%
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Adm
JAMVX17.71-0.01
-0.06%
Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Instl

EAATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and GCEI have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and GCEI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAATF
1D Price
Change %
EAATF100%
N/A
GCEI - EAATF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSKIF - EAATF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNRG - EAATF
6%
Poorly correlated
-37.50%
SCPJ - EAATF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECLMF - EAATF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SECYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECYF and ECLMF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECYF and ECLMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECYF
1D Price
Change %
SECYF100%
+0.27%
ECLMF - SECYF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMRAF - SECYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.11%
SCPJ - SECYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCEI - SECYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAATF - SECYF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More