EAATF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
6.47M
SECYF
Price
$14.14
Change
+$0.07 (+0.50%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAATF vs SECYF

Header iconEAATF vs SECYF Comparison
Open Charts EAATF vs SECYFBanner chart's image
Earthworks Industries
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization6.47M
SECURE WASTE INFRASTRUCTURE
Price$14.14
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
Volume$62.08K
Capitalization3.1B
EAATF vs SECYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAATF vs. SECYF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAATF is a Hold and SECYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EAATF: $0.04 vs. SECYF: $14.14)
Brand notoriety: EAATF and SECYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAATF: 18% vs. SECYF: 109%
Market capitalization -- EAATF: $6.47M vs. SECYF: $3.1B
EAATF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $6.47M. SECYF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAATF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSECYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EAATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SECYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the long-term than EAATF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAATF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAATF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SECYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the short-term than EAATF.

Price Growth

EAATF (@Environmental Services) experienced а -23.22% price change this week, while SECYF (@Environmental Services) price change was +8.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.61% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SECYF($3.1B) has a higher market cap than EAATF($6.47M). SECYF has higher P/E ratio than EAATF: SECYF (21.59) vs EAATF (2.26). SECYF YTD gains are higher at: 25.299 vs. EAATF (20.723). SECYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 428M vs. EAATF (-14.27M). SECYF has more cash in the bank: 31M vs. EAATF (50.6K). EAATF has less debt than SECYF: EAATF (1.77M) vs SECYF (1.01B). SECYF has higher revenues than EAATF: SECYF (10.3B) vs EAATF (0).
EAATFSECYFEAATF / SECYF
Capitalization6.47M3.1B0%
EBITDA-14.27M428M-3%
Gain YTD20.72325.29982%
P/E Ratio2.2621.5910%
Revenue010.3B-
Total Cash50.6K31M0%
Total Debt1.77M1.01B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAATF vs SECYF: Fundamental Ratings
EAATF
SECYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007
SMR RATING
1..100
10043
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAATF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SECYF (57). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to SECYF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SECYF (40). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to SECYF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAATFSECYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALM5.930.28
+4.96%
Almonty Industries Inc
LEGN33.370.55
+1.68%
Legend Biotech Corp
COF224.051.59
+0.71%
Capital One Financial
USIO1.470.01
+0.68%
Usio
JMSB20.28N/A
N/A
John Marshall Bancorp

EAATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and GCEI have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and GCEI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAATF
1D Price
Change %
EAATF100%
N/A
GCEI - EAATF
12%
Poorly correlated
+8.65%
DSKIF - EAATF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNRG - EAATF
6%
Poorly correlated
-19.26%
SCPJ - EAATF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECLMF - EAATF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SECYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECYF and ECLMF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECYF and ECLMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECYF
1D Price
Change %
SECYF100%
+0.50%
ECLMF - SECYF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMRAF - SECYF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPJ - SECYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCEI - SECYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+8.65%
EAATF - SECYF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More