EAATF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
26.5M
SECYF
Price
$12.14
Change
+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAATF vs SECYF

Header iconEAATF vs SECYF Comparison
Open Charts EAATF vs SECYFBanner chart's image
Earthworks Industries
Price$0.02
Change-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization26.5M
SECURE WASTE INFRASTRUCTURE
Price$12.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Volume$9.1K
Capitalization1.53B
EAATF vs SECYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAATF vs. SECYF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAATF is a Hold and SECYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EAATF: $0.02 vs. SECYF: $12.14)
Brand notoriety: EAATF and SECYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAATF: 3% vs. SECYF: 91%
Market capitalization -- EAATF: $26.5M vs. SECYF: $1.53B
EAATF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $26.5M. SECYF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAATF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSECYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EAATF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SECYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the long-term than EAATF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAATF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAATF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SECYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the short-term than EAATF.

Price Growth

EAATF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SECYF (@Environmental Services) price change was +1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+3.39% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SECYF($1.53B) has a higher market cap than EAATF($26.5M). SECYF YTD gains are higher at: 7.576 vs. EAATF (-35.754). SECYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. EAATF (-1.25M). SECYF has more cash in the bank: 27M vs. EAATF (782K). EAATF has less debt than SECYF: EAATF (1M) vs SECYF (1.09B). SECYF has higher revenues than EAATF: SECYF (7.86B) vs EAATF (0).
EAATFSECYFEAATF / SECYF
Capitalization26.5M1.53B2%
EBITDA-1.25M540M-0%
Gain YTD-35.7547.576-472%
P/E RatioN/A11.75-
Revenue07.86B-
Total Cash782K27M3%
Total Debt1M1.09B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAATF vs SECYF: Fundamental Ratings
EAATF
SECYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5058
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
9852
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1005
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAATF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SECYF (53). This means that EAATF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SECYF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAATF (98). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAATF (95). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAATFSECYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HUSIF0.550.04
+7.46%
Nicola Mining Inc.
SBSNY41.121.23
+3.08%
Vend Marketplaces Asa
MTCPY11.04N/A
N/A
MTR Corporation Ltd.
DGTCF0.56N/A
N/A
DIGITIAL CORE REIT MGMT PTE LTD.
SATT0.10N/A
N/A
SATIVUS TECH CORP.

EAATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and GCEI have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and GCEI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAATF
1D Price
Change %
EAATF100%
N/A
GCEI - EAATF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
DSKIF - EAATF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNRG - EAATF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
SCPJ - EAATF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECLMF - EAATF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SECYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECYF and ECLMF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECYF and ECLMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECYF
1D Price
Change %
SECYF100%
+0.17%
ECLMF - SECYF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMRAF - SECYF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPJ - SECYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCEI - SECYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
EAATF - SECYF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More