EAATF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
6.47M
ECLMF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
32.64M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAATF vs ECLMF

Header iconEAATF vs ECLMF Comparison
Open Charts EAATF vs ECLMFBanner chart's image
Earthworks Industries
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization6.47M
Ecolomondo
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization32.64M
EAATF vs ECLMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAATF vs. ECLMF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAATF is a Hold and ECLMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EAATF: $0.04 vs. ECLMF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: EAATF and ECLMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAATF: 18% vs. ECLMF: 176%
Market capitalization -- EAATF: $6.47M vs. ECLMF: $32.64M
EAATF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $6.47M. ECLMF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $32.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAATF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileECLMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EAATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ECLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAATF is a better buy in the long-term than ECLMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAATF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECLMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAATF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ECLMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EAATF and ECLMF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EAATF (@Environmental Services) experienced а -23.22% price change this week, while ECLMF (@Environmental Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.61% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECLMF($32.6M) has a higher market cap than EAATF($6.47M). ECLMF YTD gains are higher at: 105.128 vs. EAATF (20.723). ECLMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -185.68K vs. EAATF (-14.27M). ECLMF has more cash in the bank: 227K vs. EAATF (50.6K). EAATF has less debt than ECLMF: EAATF (1.77M) vs ECLMF (44.7M). ECLMF has higher revenues than EAATF: ECLMF (833K) vs EAATF (0).
EAATFECLMFEAATF / ECLMF
Capitalization6.47M32.6M20%
EBITDA-14.27M-185.68K7,688%
Gain YTD20.723105.12820%
P/E Ratio2.26N/A-
Revenue0833K-
Total Cash50.6K227K22%
Total Debt1.77M44.7M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAATF vs ECLMF: Fundamental Ratings
EAATF
ECLMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAATF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECLMF (82). This means that EAATF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (100). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

ECLMF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (100). This means that ECLMF’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (55). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (100). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAATFECLMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWLIF0.200.02
+9.89%
AMERIWEST CRITICAL METALS INC.
MJDLF8.370.12
+1.49%
Major Drilling Group International Inc.
GBERY73.350.58
+0.80%
Geberit AG
DFILF1.99N/A
N/A
DFI Retail Group Holdings Ltd.
CNNEF1.78N/A
-0.11%
Canacol Energy Ltd.

EAATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and GCEI have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and GCEI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAATF
1D Price
Change %
EAATF100%
N/A
GCEI - EAATF
12%
Poorly correlated
+8.65%
DSKIF - EAATF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNRG - EAATF
6%
Poorly correlated
-19.26%
SCPJ - EAATF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECLMF - EAATF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ECLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECLMF and SNRG have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECLMF and SNRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECLMF
1D Price
Change %
ECLMF100%
N/A
SNRG - ECLMF
13%
Poorly correlated
-19.26%
TMRAF - ECLMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - ECLMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
SCPJ - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAATF - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More