Advertisement
EAATF vs ECLMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAATF is a Hold and ECLMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EAATF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileECLMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EAATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ECLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EAATF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECLMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EAATF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- ECLMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EAATF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ECLMF (@Environmental Services) price change was -0.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.85%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+3.55% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| EAATF | ECLMF | EAATF / ECLMF | |
| Capitalization | 1.41M | 28.4M | 5% |
| EBITDA | -14.27M | -185.68K | 7,688% |
| Gain YTD | -46.212 | 106.667 | -43% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.26 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 833K | - |
| Total Cash | 50.6K | 227K | 22% |
| Total Debt | 1.77M | 44.7M | 4% |
EAATF | ECLMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 43 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EAATF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECLMF (89). This means that EAATF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.
EAATF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (100). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.
ECLMF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (100). This means that ECLMF’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.
ECLMF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (88). This means that ECLMF’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.
EAATF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (100). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.
| EAATF | ECLMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 31% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 30% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
EAATF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and SNRG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and SNRG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EAATF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAATF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SNRG - EAATF | 9% Poorly correlated | +4.47% | ||
| GCEI - EAATF | 8% Poorly correlated | -6.10% | ||
| DSKIF - EAATF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCPJ - EAATF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ECLMF - EAATF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||
ECLMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ECLMF and ANRGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECLMF and ANRGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECLMF | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| ANRGF - ECLMF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.72% | ||
| SCPJ - ECLMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMRAF - ECLMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EAATF - ECLMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SENR - ECLMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||