Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAASX vs RRMGX
EAASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$30.26
Change-$2.49 (-7.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.37B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$84.36
Change-$5.84 (-6.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
EAASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. EAASX (11.4B). EAASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: EAASX (22 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than EAASX (1.12). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. EAASX (9.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: EAASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.22 vs. EAASX (-13.74). EAASX return over 5 years is better than : -9.64 vs. RRMGX (-21.55).
| EAASX | RRMGX | EAASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.29 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.29 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.099 | -0.189 | 52% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 25.1B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.74 | -7.22 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.26 | -4.10 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.64 | -21.55 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.55 | 37.39 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers