DYLLF
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.01 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
350.79M
103 days until earnings call
FRACF
Price
$1.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
134.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DYLLF vs FRACF

Header iconDYLLF vs FRACF Comparison
Open Charts DYLLF vs FRACFBanner chart's image
Deep Yellow
Price$0.86
Change+$0.01 (+1.18%)
Volume$50.64K
Capitalization350.79M
Foraco International, Marseille
Price$1.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization134.37M
DYLLF vs FRACF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DYLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DYLLF vs. FRACF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYLLF is a Hold and FRACF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (DYLLF: $0.86 vs. FRACF: $1.29)
Brand notoriety: DYLLF and FRACF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DYLLF: 49% vs. FRACF: 9%
Market capitalization -- DYLLF: $350.79M vs. FRACF: $134.37M
DYLLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $350.79M. FRACF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $134.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DYLLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRACF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DYLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRACF is a better buy in the long-term than DYLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DYLLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DYLLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

DYLLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRACF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

DYLLF is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DYLLF($351M) has a higher market cap than FRACF($134M). DYLLF has higher P/E ratio than FRACF: DYLLF (79.37) vs FRACF (4.90). DYLLF YTD gains are higher at: 21.127 vs. FRACF (-24.561). FRACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.7M vs. DYLLF (-8.58M). FRACF has more cash in the bank: 27.6M vs. DYLLF (12.1M). DYLLF has less debt than FRACF: DYLLF (636K) vs FRACF (113M). FRACF has higher revenues than DYLLF: FRACF (351M) vs DYLLF (147K).
DYLLFFRACFDYLLF / FRACF
Capitalization351M134M262%
EBITDA-8.58M77.7M-11%
Gain YTD21.127-24.561-86%
P/E Ratio79.374.901,621%
Revenue147K351M0%
Total Cash12.1M27.6M44%
Total Debt636K113M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DYLLF vs FRACF: Fundamental Ratings
DYLLF
FRACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4045
SMR RATING
1..100
8939
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4478
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
738
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRACF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as DYLLF (94). This means that FRACF’s stock grew similarly to DYLLF’s over the last 12 months.

DYLLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (45). This means that DYLLF’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DYLLF (89). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DYLLF’s over the last 12 months.

DYLLF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRACF (78). This means that DYLLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

DYLLF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (38). This means that DYLLF’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DYLLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DYLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEVCX20.89-0.04
-0.19%
First Eagle US C
LHCSX18.21-0.10
-0.55%
Lord Abbett Health Care R4
GCLSX23.64-0.26
-1.09%
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
ASLDX128.12-1.81
-1.39%
American Century Select G
KGDZX30.88-0.49
-1.56%
DWS Global Small Cap R6

DYLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DYLLF has been loosely correlated with BNNLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DYLLF jumps, then BNNLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DYLLF
1D Price
Change %
DYLLF100%
+1.49%
BNNLF - DYLLF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
SRUUF - DYLLF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
ISOU - DYLLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
WSTRF - DYLLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
LMRXF - DYLLF
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
More

FRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRACF and NEVDQ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRACF and NEVDQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRACF
1D Price
Change %
FRACF100%
N/A
NEVDQ - FRACF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YLLXF - FRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STRPF - FRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
LMRXF - FRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
DYLLF - FRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
More