Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DYGAX vs RGWBX
DYGAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts DYGAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Adviser
Price$15.41
Change-$0.13 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets512.51M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.85
Change-$0.82 (-2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
DYGAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DYGAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYGAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. DYGAX (513M). DYGAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: DYGAX (1.30) vs RGWBX (0.00). DYGAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: DYGAX (9 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than DYGAX (1.09). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DYGAX: RGWBX (250) vs DYGAX (2500). DYGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.36 vs. RGWBX (10.69). RGWBX (17.86) and DYGAX (17.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DYGAX | RGWBX | DYGAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.898 | 1.052 | 370% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 25.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.36 | 10.69 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.92 | 48.42 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.05 | 17.86 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers