DYFSF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
46.2M
EBCOF
Price
$15.53
Change
-$1.62 (-9.45%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
10.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DYFSF vs EBCOF

Header iconDYFSF vs EBCOF Comparison
Open Charts DYFSF vs EBCOFBanner chart's image
Dynacert
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$73.16K
Capitalization46.2M
Ebara
Price$15.53
Change-$1.62 (-9.45%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization10.17B
DYFSF vs EBCOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DYFSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DYFSF vs. EBCOF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYFSF is a Hold and EBCOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (DYFSF: $0.09 vs. EBCOF: $15.53)
Brand notoriety: DYFSF and EBCOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DYFSF: 389% vs. EBCOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- DYFSF: $46.2M vs. EBCOF: $10.17B
DYFSF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $46.2M. EBCOF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $10.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $213.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DYFSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEBCOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DYFSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EBCOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBCOF is a better buy in the long-term than DYFSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DYFSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DYFSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

DYFSF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -1.78% price change this week, while EBCOF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.00% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBCOF($10.2B) has a higher market cap than DYFSF($46.2M). EBCOF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. DYFSF (-19.299).
DYFSFEBCOFDYFSF / EBCOF
Capitalization46.2M10.2B0%
EBITDA-10.33MN/A-
Gain YTD-19.2990.000-
P/E RatioN/A14.84-
Revenue1.9MN/A-
Total Cash3.21MN/A-
Total Debt2.53MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DYFSF vs EBCOF: Fundamental Ratings
DYFSF
EBCOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1847
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
10055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8171
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBCOF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DYFSF (98). This means that EBCOF’s stock grew significantly faster than DYFSF’s over the last 12 months.

EBCOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as DYFSF (100). This means that EBCOF’s stock grew similarly to DYFSF’s over the last 12 months.

EBCOF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DYFSF (100). This means that EBCOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DYFSF’s over the last 12 months.

EBCOF's Price Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as DYFSF (81). This means that EBCOF’s stock grew similarly to DYFSF’s over the last 12 months.

EBCOF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as DYFSF (100). This means that EBCOF’s stock grew similarly to DYFSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DYFSFEBCOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DYFSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBYCF0.05N/A
+5.12%
Niobay Metals Inc.
KNYJF60.05N/A
N/A
Kone Oyj
SQZZF2.33N/A
N/A
Serica Energy Plc
CMCAF11.40N/A
N/A
Capitalworks Emerging Markets Acquisition Corp
HLPPY5.11-0.19
-3.58%
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.

DYFSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DYFSF and KMRCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DYFSF and KMRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DYFSF
1D Price
Change %
DYFSF100%
N/A
KMRCF - DYFSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEIGY - DYFSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANUY - DYFSF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
EBCOF - DYFSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANUF - DYFSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

EBCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EBCOF and PVARF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EBCOF and PVARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBCOF
1D Price
Change %
EBCOF100%
N/A
PVARF - EBCOF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPTT - EBCOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
DYFSF - EBCOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBCOY - EBCOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+7.05%
ECTXF - EBCOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More