DYCQ
Price
$11.10
Change
-$0.30 (-2.63%)
Updated
Sep 25, 03:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.3M
GPAT
Price
$10.60
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Sep 25, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
380.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DYCQ vs GPAT

Header iconDYCQ vs GPAT Comparison
Open Charts DYCQ vs GPATBanner chart's image
DT Cloud Acquisition
Price$11.10
Change-$0.30 (-2.63%)
Volume$500
Capitalization33.3M
GP-Act III Acquisition
Price$10.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization380.58M
DYCQ vs GPAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DYCQ vs. GPAT commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYCQ is a Hold and GPAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DYCQ: $11.50 vs. GPAT: $10.59)
Brand notoriety: DYCQ and GPAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DYCQ: 11% vs. GPAT: 0%
Market capitalization -- DYCQ: $33.3M vs. GPAT: $380.58M
DYCQ [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $33.3M. GPAT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $380.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.9M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DYCQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGPAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DYCQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GPAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DYCQ and GPAT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

DYCQ (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GPAT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.91% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPAT($381M) has a higher market cap than DYCQ($33.3M). DYCQ has higher P/E ratio than GPAT: DYCQ (46.40) vs GPAT (27.87). DYCQ YTD gains are higher at: 10.153 vs. GPAT (4.438). GPAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -669.21K vs. DYCQ (-910.83K). GPAT has more cash in the bank: 246K vs. DYCQ (0). GPAT has less debt than DYCQ: GPAT (400K) vs DYCQ (546K). DYCQ (0) and GPAT (0) have equivalent revenues.
DYCQGPATDYCQ / GPAT
Capitalization33.3M381M9%
EBITDA-910.83K-669.21K136%
Gain YTD10.1534.438229%
P/E Ratio46.4027.87167%
Revenue00-
Total Cash0246K-
Total Debt546K400K137%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DYCQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFNIX26.990.06
+0.22%
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth I
TNXIX21.25N/A
N/A
1290 Avantis U.S. Large Cap Growth I
CCWRX9.81-0.05
-0.51%
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
PRGSX72.79-0.39
-0.53%
T. Rowe Price Global Stock
EMCCX56.65-0.35
-0.61%
Empiric Class C

DYCQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DYCQ has been loosely correlated with HCMAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DYCQ jumps, then HCMAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DYCQ
1D Price
Change %
DYCQ100%
N/A
HCMAU - DYCQ
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
GPAT - DYCQ
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
DYCQU - DYCQ
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVIIU - DYCQ
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.14%
GPATU - DYCQ
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GPAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPAT and QETA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPAT and QETA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPAT
1D Price
Change %
GPAT100%
+0.09%
QETA - GPAT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYCQ - GPAT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETDU - GPAT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LPAAU - GPAT
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCIX - GPAT
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More