Advertisement
DY vs JGCCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DY is a StrongBuy and JGCCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJGCCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- JGCCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JGCCY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- JGCCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
DY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.94% price change this week, while JGCCY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
DY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+0.08% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| DY | JGCCY | DY / JGCCY | |
| Capitalization | 10.4B | 2.96B | 351% |
| EBITDA | 690M | 22.2B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 99.718 | 55.530 | 180% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.22 | 18.46 | 185% |
| Revenue | 5.17B | 833B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 110M | 305B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.07B | 34.4B | 3% |
DY | JGCCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JGCCY's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as DY (81) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that JGCCY’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
DY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGCCY (69) in the null industry. This means that DY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.
JGCCY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DY (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that JGCCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DY’s over the last 12 months.
DY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as JGCCY (41) in the null industry. This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.
DY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as JGCCY (20) in the null industry. This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.
| DY | JGCCY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NJUL | 72.98 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Bfr ETF Jul | |||
| JULU | 29.95 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncJulETF | |||
| FOWF | 31.42 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| Pacer Solactive Whitney Fut of Wrfr ETF | |||
| LKOR | 42.72 | -0.05 | -0.12% |
| FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF | |||
| DDWM | 43.61 | -0.07 | -0.16% |
| WisdomTree Dynamic International Eq ETF | |||
DY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DY has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DY jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
JGCCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JGCCY and JGCCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGCCY and JGCCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JGCCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JGCCY | 100% | N/A | ||
| JGCCF - JGCCY | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KLRGF - JGCCY | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DY - JGCCY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| AEGXF - JGCCY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SLND - JGCCY | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.19% | ||
More | ||||