Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DWOAX vs RGACX
DWOAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts DWOAX vs RGACX
BNY Mellon Research Growth A
Price$20.73
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.93B
DWOAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DWOAX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DWOAX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. DWOAX (1.7B). RGACX pays higher dividends than DWOAX: RGACX (0.07) vs DWOAX (0.00). DWOAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: DWOAX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). DWOAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). DWOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.94 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DWOAX: RGACX (250) vs DWOAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.41 vs. DWOAX (9.92). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.92 vs. DWOAX (8.93).
| DWOAX | RGACX | DWOAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.94 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.119 | 14.308 | 29% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.92 | 14.41 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.81 | 45.56 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.93 | 40.92 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.04 | 96.18 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement