DWAHF
Price
$36.81
Change
+$3.77 (+11.41%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
18.03B
GRNNF
Price
$12.08
Change
+$1.58 (+15.05%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DWAHF vs GRNNF

Header iconDWAHF vs GRNNF Comparison
Open Charts DWAHF vs GRNNFBanner chart's image
Daiwa House Industry
Price$36.81
Change+$3.77 (+11.41%)
Volume$378
Capitalization18.03B
Grand City Pptys SA
Price$12.08
Change+$1.58 (+15.05%)
Volume$182
Capitalization1.42B
DWAHF vs GRNNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DWAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DWAHF vs. GRNNF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DWAHF is a Hold and GRNNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DWAHF: $36.81 vs. GRNNF: $12.08)
Brand notoriety: DWAHF and GRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DWAHF: 67% vs. GRNNF: 148%
Market capitalization -- DWAHF: $18.03B vs. GRNNF: $1.42B
DWAHF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $18.03B. GRNNF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DWAHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DWAHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DWAHF is a better buy in the long-term than GRNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DWAHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRNNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DWAHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GRNNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRNNF is a better buy in the short-term than DWAHF.

Price Growth

DWAHF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRNNF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DWAHF($18B) has a higher market cap than GRNNF($1.43B). GRNNF has higher P/E ratio than DWAHF: GRNNF (14.71) vs DWAHF (8.19). DWAHF YTD gains are higher at: 20.609 vs. GRNNF (-0.116). DWAHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 337B vs. GRNNF (213M). DWAHF has more cash in the bank: 389B vs. GRNNF (571M). GRNNF has less debt than DWAHF: GRNNF (4B) vs DWAHF (2.13T). DWAHF has higher revenues than GRNNF: DWAHF (4.71T) vs GRNNF (400M).
DWAHFGRNNFDWAHF / GRNNF
Capitalization18B1.43B1,263%
EBITDA337B213M158,216%
Gain YTD20.609-0.116-17,798%
P/E Ratio8.1914.7156%
Revenue4.71T400M1,178,500%
Total Cash389B571M68,126%
Total Debt2.13T4B53,227%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DWAHF vs GRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
DWAHF
GRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
10084
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5275
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRNNF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DWAHF (50). This means that GRNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DWAHF’s over the last 12 months.

DWAHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRNNF (100). This means that DWAHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

GRNNF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as DWAHF (100). This means that GRNNF’s stock grew similarly to DWAHF’s over the last 12 months.

DWAHF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GRNNF (49). This means that DWAHF’s stock grew similarly to GRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

DWAHF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as GRNNF (75). This means that DWAHF’s stock grew similarly to GRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DWAHFGRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
10%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DWAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZVGNX56.371.21
+2.19%
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
RYTFX7.900.06
+0.77%
Royce Small-Cap Total Return Svc
JORAX20.320.13
+0.64%
Janus Henderson Global Select A
MEFIX14.350.09
+0.63%
Martin Currie Emerging Markets FI
JABAX49.030.27
+0.55%
Janus Henderson Balanced T

DWAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DWAHF and GRNNF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DWAHF and GRNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DWAHF
1D Price
Change %
DWAHF100%
N/A
GRNNF - DWAHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DITTF - DWAHF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIFTY - DWAHF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
DTCWY - DWAHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DWAHY - DWAHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More

GRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRNNF and SIOLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRNNF and SIOLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRNNF
1D Price
Change %
GRNNF100%
N/A
SIOLY - GRNNF
28%
Poorly correlated
-9.09%
LPA - GRNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
DWAHF - GRNNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAGOF - GRNNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZTGF - GRNNF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More