Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DVZRX vs SSGSX
DVZRX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DVZRX vs SSGSX
Macquarie Small Cap Value R6
Price$72.55
Change-$1.17 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.54B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
DVZRX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DVZRX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DVZRX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. DVZRX (3.54B). DVZRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DVZRX (1.29) vs SSGSX (0.49). DVZRX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DVZRX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than DVZRX (0.70). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DVZRX (19.00). DVZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: DVZRX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). DVZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.71 vs. SSGSX (-13.37). DVZRX return over 5 years is better than : 29.67 vs. SSGSX (7.38).
| DVZRX | SSGSX | DVZRX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.26 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.26 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.717 | -1.357 | -274% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.54B | 5.23B | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.49 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.71 | -13.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.70 | -6.72 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.67 | 7.38 | 402% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers