DVLT
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
44.83M
GTLB
Price
$44.28
Change
+$3.33 (+8.13%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.32B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DVLT vs GTLB

Header iconDVLT vs GTLB Comparison
Open Charts DVLT vs GTLBBanner chart's image
Datavault AI
Price$0.46
Change-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Volume$1.04M
Capitalization44.83M
GitLab
Price$44.28
Change+$3.33 (+8.13%)
Volume$5.42M
Capitalization7.32B
DVLT vs GTLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DVLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DVLT vs. GTLB commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DVLT is a Hold and GTLB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (DVLT: $0.46 vs. GTLB: $44.28)
Brand notoriety: DVLT and GTLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DVLT: 29% vs. GTLB: 113%
Market capitalization -- DVLT: $44.83M vs. GTLB: $7.32B
DVLT [@Computer Communications] is valued at $44.83M. GTLB’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $7.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.87T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DVLT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DVLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DVLT is a better buy in the long-term than GTLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DVLT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DVLT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GTLB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than DVLT.

Price Growth

DVLT (@Computer Communications) experienced а +9.18% price change this week, while GTLB (@Computer Communications) price change was +9.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.18% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLB($7.32B) has a higher market cap than DVLT($44.8M). GTLB has higher P/E ratio than DVLT: GTLB (492.00) vs DVLT (0.00). GTLB YTD gains are higher at: -21.420 vs. DVLT (-77.615). DVLT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -24.04M vs. GTLB (-112.15M). GTLB has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. DVLT (171K). GTLB has less debt than DVLT: GTLB (392K) vs DVLT (9.39M). GTLB has higher revenues than DVLT: GTLB (805M) vs DVLT (3.05M).
DVLTGTLBDVLT / GTLB
Capitalization44.8M7.32B1%
EBITDA-24.04M-112.15M21%
Gain YTD-77.615-21.420362%
P/E Ratio0.00492.000%
Revenue3.05M805M0%
Total Cash171K1.11B0%
Total Debt9.39M392K2,396%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DVLT: Fundamental Ratings
DVLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DVLTGTLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DVLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GJH9.350.01
+0.11%
Synthetic Fixed-Income Sec STRATS 2004-06
PAPI25.780.02
+0.08%
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
MDEV20.49N/A
N/A
First Trust Indxx Global Mdcl Dvcs ETF
VAMO31.39-0.09
-0.28%
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
STRV41.62-0.13
-0.31%
Strive 500 ETF

DVLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DVLT and GTLB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DVLT and GTLB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DVLT
1D Price
Change %
DVLT100%
-1.35%
GTLB - DVLT
28%
Poorly correlated
+8.13%
OXINF - DVLT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VERI - DVLT
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
REKR - DVLT
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
ALAR - DVLT
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
+8.13%
PATH - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
HUBS - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
TEAM - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
MDB - GTLB
57%
Loosely correlated
+6.80%
FRSH - GTLB
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More