DVLN
Price
$3600.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
14.29M
FCRM
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.03 (+150.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DVLN vs FCRM

Header iconDVLN vs FCRM Comparison
Open Charts DVLN vs FCRMBanner chart's image
DVL
Price$3600.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2
Capitalization14.29M
Franklin Credit Management
Price$0.05
Change+$0.03 (+150.00%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization1M
DVLN vs FCRM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DVLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DVLN vs. FCRM commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DVLN is a Hold and FCRM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (DVLN: $3600.00 vs. FCRM: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: DVLN and FCRM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DVLN: 43% vs. FCRM: 20%
Market capitalization -- DVLN: $14.29M vs. FCRM: $1M
DVLN [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $14.29M. FCRM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DVLN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DVLN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DVLN is a better buy in the long-term than FCRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DVLN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCRM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DVLN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FCRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCRM is a better buy in the short-term than DVLN.

Price Growth

DVLN (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FCRM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +174.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DVLN($14.3M) has a higher market cap than FCRM($1M). DVLN YTD gains are higher at: -20.000 vs. FCRM (-54.545). FCRM has less debt than DVLN: FCRM (688K) vs DVLN (36.5M). FCRM has higher revenues than DVLN: FCRM (12.8M) vs DVLN (9.11M).
DVLNFCRMDVLN / FCRM
Capitalization14.3M1M1,424%
EBITDA5.57MN/A-
Gain YTD-20.000-54.54537%
P/E RatioN/A2.71-
Revenue9.11M12.8M71%
Total Cash1.77MN/A-
Total Debt36.5M688K5,305%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DVLN vs FCRM: Fundamental Ratings
DVLN
FCRM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
7567
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8198
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DVLN's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FCRM (64). This means that DVLN’s stock grew similarly to FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

DVLN's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCRM (100). This means that DVLN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

FCRM's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as DVLN (75). This means that FCRM’s stock grew similarly to DVLN’s over the last 12 months.

DVLN's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as FCRM (98). This means that DVLN’s stock grew similarly to FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

DVLN's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FCRM (100). This means that DVLN’s stock grew similarly to FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DVLNFCRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DVLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KWR115.150.86
+0.75%
Quaker Houghton
PRSU28.920.05
+0.17%
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality Inc
EDUC1.36-0.01
-0.73%
Educational Development Corp
XYL128.23-1.27
-0.98%
Xylem
DSP13.29-0.29
-2.14%
Viant Technology

DVLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DVLN and FCMGF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DVLN and FCMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DVLN
1D Price
Change %
DVLN100%
N/A
FCMGF - DVLN
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
EHMEF - DVLN
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMY - DVLN
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
FCRM - DVLN
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEEF - DVLN
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
More

FCRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCRM and FNLIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCRM and FNLIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCRM
1D Price
Change %
FCRM100%
N/A
FNLIF - FCRM
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENVA - FCRM
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
FMCC - FCRM
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
FNMA - FCRM
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
FAVO - FCRM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More