DVDDF
Price
$5.00
Change
+$0.38 (+8.23%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
106.26M
HFAHF
Price
$1.35
Change
+$0.27 (+24.77%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
712.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DVDDF vs HFAHF

Header iconDVDDF vs HFAHF Comparison
Open Charts DVDDF vs HFAHFBanner chart's image
Dividend 15 Split Corp II
Price$5.00
Change+$0.38 (+8.23%)
Volume$120
Capitalization106.26M
Navigator Global Invts
Price$1.35
Change+$0.27 (+24.77%)
Volume$22.5K
Capitalization712.73M
DVDDF vs HFAHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DVDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DVDDF vs. HFAHF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DVDDF is a Buy and HFAHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DVDDF: $5.00 vs. HFAHF: $1.36)
Brand notoriety: DVDDF and HFAHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DVDDF: 31% vs. HFAHF: 112%
Market capitalization -- DVDDF: $106.26M vs. HFAHF: $712.73M
DVDDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $106.26M. HFAHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $712.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DVDDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHFAHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DVDDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HFAHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DVDDF and HFAHF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DVDDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFAHF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DVDDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HFAHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFAHF is a better buy in the short-term than DVDDF.

Price Growth

DVDDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +8.13% price change this week, while HFAHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +24.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFAHF($713M) has a higher market cap than DVDDF($106M). HFAHF has higher P/E ratio than DVDDF: HFAHF (6.26) vs DVDDF (2.59). DVDDF YTD gains are higher at: 39.575 vs. HFAHF (15.812).
DVDDFHFAHFDVDDF / HFAHF
Capitalization106M713M15%
EBITDAN/A159M-
Gain YTD39.57515.812250%
P/E Ratio2.596.2641%
RevenueN/A318M-
Total CashN/A61.6M-
Total DebtN/A24.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DVDDF: Fundamental Ratings
DVDDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DVDDFHFAHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DVDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGJIX19.280.18
+0.94%
Nuveen Global Real Estate Securities I
VTRIX45.200.28
+0.62%
Vanguard International Value Inv
SSDZX36.430.22
+0.61%
DWS Small Cap Growth R6
BRMAX16.03N/A
N/A
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Inv A
FCLTX51.94-0.21
-0.40%
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M

DVDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DVDDF and KKR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DVDDF and KKR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DVDDF
1D Price
Change %
DVDDF100%
N/A
KKR - DVDDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
BBXIA - DVDDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITPC - DVDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TEKCF - DVDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFAHF - DVDDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+24.31%
More

HFAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFAHF and RMGOF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFAHF and RMGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFAHF
1D Price
Change %
HFAHF100%
+24.31%
RMGOF - HFAHF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFES - HFAHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
CGBD - HFAHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
ITPC - HFAHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DVDDF - HFAHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More