DTWOF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.47M
GGTHF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTWOF vs GGTHF

Header iconDTWOF vs GGTHF Comparison
Open Charts DTWOF vs GGTHFBanner chart's image
D2 LITHIUM
Price$0.05
Change+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Volume$800
Capitalization5.47M
Golden Goliath Resources
Price$0.04
Change+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization1.71M
DTWOF vs GGTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTWOF vs. GGTHF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTWOF is a Buy and GGTHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DTWOF: $0.05 vs. GGTHF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: DTWOF and GGTHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTWOF: 7% vs. GGTHF: 25%
Market capitalization -- DTWOF: $5.47M vs. GGTHF: $1.71M
DTWOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.47M. GGTHF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTWOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGGTHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTWOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GGTHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DTWOF is a better buy in the long-term than GGTHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTWOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGTHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTWOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GGTHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DTWOF is a better buy in the short-term than GGTHF.

Price Growth

DTWOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GGTHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.55% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTWOF($5.47M) has a higher market cap than GGTHF($1.71M). DTWOF YTD gains are higher at: 241.867 vs. GGTHF (111.429).
DTWOFGGTHFDTWOF / GGTHF
Capitalization5.47M1.71M320%
EBITDAN/A-538.82K-
Gain YTD241.867111.429217%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A430K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTWOF vs GGTHF: Fundamental Ratings
DTWOF
GGTHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3596
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTWOF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as GGTHF (45). This means that DTWOF’s stock grew similarly to GGTHF’s over the last 12 months.

DTWOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GGTHF (100). This means that DTWOF’s stock grew similarly to GGTHF’s over the last 12 months.

GGTHF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as DTWOF (100). This means that GGTHF’s stock grew similarly to DTWOF’s over the last 12 months.

DTWOF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGTHF (96). This means that DTWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGTHF’s over the last 12 months.

DTWOF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGTHF (100). This means that DTWOF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGTHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTWOFGGTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SXC8.180.19
+2.38%
Suncoke Energy
GLW51.820.12
+0.23%
Corning
BCO89.10-0.84
-0.93%
Brink's Company (The)
TLYS1.25-0.02
-1.57%
Tilly's
BOLD1.01-0.06
-5.61%
Boundless Bio

DTWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTWOF and LZM have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTWOF and LZM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTWOF
1D Price
Change %
DTWOF100%
N/A
LZM - DTWOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
ATCUF - DTWOF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIGGF - DTWOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
ABAT - DTWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.15%
LIFFF - DTWOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GGTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGTHF and LZM have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGTHF and LZM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGTHF
1D Price
Change %
GGTHF100%
N/A
LZM - GGTHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
BLIDF - GGTHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIFFF - GGTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTWOF - GGTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCLIF - GGTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+18.33%
More