DTSRF
Price
$3.57
Change
+$0.04 (+1.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.4M
ESIFF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTSRF vs ESIFF

Header iconDTSRF vs ESIFF Comparison
Open Charts DTSRF vs ESIFFBanner chart's image
PURPOSE ETHER STAKING CORP. ETF
Price$3.57
Change+$0.04 (+1.13%)
Volume$12.2K
Capitalization49.4M
AI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE VENTURES
Price$0.29
Change-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Volume$13.31K
Capitalization7.44M
DTSRF vs ESIFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTSRF vs. ESIFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTSRF is a Hold and ESIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DTSRF: $3.57 vs. ESIFF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: DTSRF and ESIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTSRF: 495% vs. ESIFF: 624%
Market capitalization -- DTSRF: $49.4M vs. ESIFF: $7.44M
DTSRF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $49.4M. ESIFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTSRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESIFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESIFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DTSRF is a better buy in the long-term than ESIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTSRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESIFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTSRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ESIFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DTSRF is a better buy in the short-term than ESIFF.

Price Growth

DTSRF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.74% price change this week, while ESIFF (@Investment Managers) price change was -10.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTSRF($49.4M) has a higher market cap than ESIFF($7.44M). DTSRF has higher P/E ratio than ESIFF: DTSRF (6.90) vs ESIFF (0.65). ESIFF YTD gains are higher at: 9.364 vs. DTSRF (-32.664). ESIFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -617.62K vs. DTSRF (-703.74K). ESIFF has more cash in the bank: 6.81M vs. DTSRF (2.44M). DTSRF has less debt than ESIFF: DTSRF (60.1K) vs ESIFF (260K). ESIFF has higher revenues than DTSRF: ESIFF (5.18M) vs DTSRF (3.67M).
DTSRFESIFFDTSRF / ESIFF
Capitalization49.4M7.44M664%
EBITDA-703.74K-617.62K114%
Gain YTD-32.6649.364-349%
P/E Ratio6.900.651,069%
Revenue3.67M5.18M71%
Total Cash2.44M6.81M36%
Total Debt60.1K260K23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTSRF vs ESIFF: Fundamental Ratings
DTSRF
ESIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4265
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTSRF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as ESIFF (90). This means that DTSRF’s stock grew similarly to ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

DTSRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ESIFF (65). This means that DTSRF’s stock grew similarly to ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

DTSRF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ESIFF (99). This means that DTSRF’s stock grew similarly to ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

ESIFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as DTSRF (56). This means that ESIFF’s stock grew similarly to DTSRF’s over the last 12 months.

DTSRF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESIFF (71). This means that DTSRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTSRFESIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CORBF1.50N/A
N/A
Global Cord Blood Corporation
IRLCF273.00N/A
N/A
Israel Corp.
NFLDF0.04N/A
N/A
Exploits Discovery Corp.
LFABF43.00N/A
N/A
Lifco AB
GLVT4.00N/A
N/A
Greenlit Ventures Inc.

DTSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTSRF and ARES have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTSRF and ARES's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTSRF
1D Price
Change %
DTSRF100%
+1.20%
ARES - DTSRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
ENFD - DTSRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWL - DTSRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
CG - DTSRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
ICGUF - DTSRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ESIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESIFF and EQBBF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESIFF and EQBBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESIFF
1D Price
Change %
ESIFF100%
N/A
EQBBF - ESIFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDCF - ESIFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - ESIFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
CYMBF - ESIFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRSGF - ESIFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More