Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTLGX vs RGACX
DTLGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts DTLGX vs RGACX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt
Price$49.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.59M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
DTLGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTLGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTLGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. DTLGX (275M). RGACX pays higher dividends than DTLGX: RGACX (0.07) vs DTLGX (0.00). DTLGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: DTLGX (33 years) vs RGACX (23 years). DTLGX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). DTLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTLGX: RGACX (250) vs DTLGX (1000). RGACX (17.83) and DTLGX (17.08) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. DTLGX (-0.16).
| DTLGX | RGACX | DTLGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.94 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.817 | 15.516 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.08 | 17.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.56 | 58.53 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.16 | 40.02 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.58 | 95.93 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement