Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTLGX vs GFFFX
DTLGX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts DTLGX vs GFFFX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt
Price$40.25
Change-$12.33 (-23.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.31M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$79.31
Change-$9.63 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
DTLGX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTLGX vs. GFFFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTLGX is a StrongBuy and GFFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. DTLGX (278M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than DTLGX: GFFFX (0.46) vs DTLGX (0.00). DTLGX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: DTLGX (33 years) vs GFFFX (18 years). DTLGX (1.32) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). DTLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTLGX: GFFFX (250) vs DTLGX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.94 vs. DTLGX (-7.41). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.53 vs. DTLGX (-12.52).
| DTLGX | GFFFX | DTLGX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.40 | 325% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.40 | 330% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.613 | -0.999 | 262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.41 | 2.94 | -252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 45.91 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.52 | 14.53 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.49 | 121.87 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement