Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTLGX vs GFFFX
DTLGX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts DTLGX vs GFFFX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt
Price$42.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.37M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
DTLGX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTLGX vs. GFFFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTLGX is a StrongBuy and GFFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. DTLGX (287M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than DTLGX: GFFFX (0.49) vs DTLGX (0.00). DTLGX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: DTLGX (33 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). DTLGX (1.32) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). DTLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTLGX: GFFFX (250) vs DTLGX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. DTLGX (-4.87). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.69 vs. DTLGX (-4.14).
| DTLGX | GFFFX | DTLGX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.40 | 325% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.40 | 330% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.293 | 9.236 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.87 | 6.03 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.50 | 67.67 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.14 | 23.69 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.59 | 96.62 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement