DTGHF vs EPIAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTGHF is a Hold and EPIAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DTGHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEPIAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DTGHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EPIAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
DTGHF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -4.44% price change this week, while EPIAF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -11.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.23%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-2.40% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| DTGHF | EPIAF | DTGHF / EPIAF | |
| Capitalization | 31.1B | 22.9B | 136% |
| EBITDA | 5.5B | 15B | 37% |
| Gain YTD | 1.564 | -10.562 | -15% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.89 | 26.81 | 33% |
| Revenue | 53.6B | 56.5B | 95% |
| Total Cash | 9.71B | 6.56B | 148% |
| Total Debt | 21.1B | 14.2B | 149% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
DTGHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DTGHF has been loosely correlated with DTRUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DTGHF jumps, then DTRUY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DTGHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTGHF | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| DTRUY - DTGHF | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.64% | ||
| VLVLY - DTGHF | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| IVCGF - DTGHF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| OUKPY - DTGHF | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
| SIHBY - DTGHF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
EPIAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPIAF has been loosely correlated with EPOKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPIAF jumps, then EPOKY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPIAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIAF | 100% | -2.57% | ||
| EPOKY - EPIAF | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| VLVLY - EPIAF | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| DTRUY - EPIAF | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.64% | ||
| OUKPY - EPIAF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
| DTGHF - EPIAF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
More | ||||