DTEAF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.02 (-2.53%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
11.18M
57 days until earnings call
SWSSF
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.38 (-15.97%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
23.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTEAF vs SWSSF

Header iconDTEAF vs SWSSF Comparison
Open Charts DTEAF vs SWSSFBanner chart's image
DAVIDsTEA
Price$0.77
Change-$0.02 (-2.53%)
Volume$28.27K
Capitalization11.18M
Swiss Wtr Decaffinated Coffee
Price$2.00
Change-$0.38 (-15.97%)
Volume$500
Capitalization23.18M
DTEAF vs SWSSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTEAF vs. SWSSF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTEAF is a Hold and SWSSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (DTEAF: $0.77 vs. SWSSF: $2.00)
Brand notoriety: DTEAF and SWSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTEAF: 73% vs. SWSSF: 4%
Market capitalization -- DTEAF: $11.18M vs. SWSSF: $23.18M
DTEAF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $11.18M. SWSSF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $23.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTEAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWSSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTEAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DTEAF is a better buy in the long-term than SWSSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTEAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWSSF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTEAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWSSF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWSSF is a better buy in the short-term than DTEAF.

Price Growth

DTEAF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -7.21% price change this week, while SWSSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +11.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

DTEAF is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+11.17% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWSSF($23.2M) has a higher market cap than DTEAF($11.2M). DTEAF YTD gains are higher at: 88.195 vs. SWSSF (-20.000).
DTEAFSWSSFDTEAF / SWSSF
Capitalization11.2M23.2M48%
EBITDAN/A16.9M-
Gain YTD88.195-20.000-441%
P/E RatioN/A83.33-
RevenueN/A166M-
Total CashN/A11.1M-
Total DebtN/A118M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTEAF vs SWSSF: Fundamental Ratings
DTEAF
SWSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9583
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3687
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTEAF's Valuation (77) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SWSSF (77) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

DTEAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SWSSF (100) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSSF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as DTEAF (95) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.

DTEAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWSSF (87) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

DTEAF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SWSSF (100) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTEAFSWSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCSV0.10N/A
+1.50%
PCS Edventures!.com, Inc.
BGAOY1.95N/A
N/A
Proximus Group
NSARO77.00N/A
N/A
NSTAR Electric Co.
THNCF1.57N/A
N/A
Thinkific Labs Inc.
BKRIF13.95-0.19
-1.35%
Bank Ireland Group PLC

DTEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTEAF and PRRFY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTEAF and PRRFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTEAF
1D Price
Change %
DTEAF100%
-2.23%
PRRFY - DTEAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWSSF - DTEAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFVN - DTEAF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
SMPL - DTEAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
NOMD - DTEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

SWSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWSSF has been loosely correlated with PRRFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWSSF jumps, then PRRFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWSSF
1D Price
Change %
SWSSF100%
N/A
PRRFY - SWSSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DTEAF - SWSSF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
SHVTF - SWSSF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYY - SWSSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYF - SWSSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More