DTEAF
Price
$0.69
Change
-$0.02 (-2.82%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
18.5M
10 days until earnings call
SWSSF
Price
$2.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
28.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTEAF vs SWSSF

Header iconDTEAF vs SWSSF Comparison
Open Charts DTEAF vs SWSSFBanner chart's image
DAVIDsTEA
Price$0.69
Change-$0.02 (-2.82%)
Volume$12.79K
Capitalization18.5M
Swiss Wtr Decaffinated Coffee
Price$2.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.1K
Capitalization28.23M
DTEAF vs SWSSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTEAF vs. SWSSF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTEAF is a Hold and SWSSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DTEAF: $0.69 vs. SWSSF: $2.99)
Brand notoriety: DTEAF and SWSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTEAF: 91% vs. SWSSF: 290%
Market capitalization -- DTEAF: $18.5M vs. SWSSF: $28.23M
DTEAF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $18.5M. SWSSF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $28.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTEAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWSSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTEAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DTEAF and SWSSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTEAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWSSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTEAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SWSSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWSSF is a better buy in the short-term than DTEAF.

Price Growth

DTEAF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -8.51% price change this week, while SWSSF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

DTEAF is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWSSF($28.2M) has a higher market cap than DTEAF($18.5M). DTEAF YTD gains are higher at: 66.505 vs. SWSSF (19.600).
DTEAFSWSSFDTEAF / SWSSF
Capitalization18.5M28.2M66%
EBITDAN/A16.4M-
Gain YTD66.50519.600339%
P/E RatioN/A9.83-
RevenueN/A221M-
Total CashN/A4.79M-
Total DebtN/A124M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTEAF vs SWSSF: Fundamental Ratings
DTEAF
SWSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7648
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
9689
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTEAF's Valuation (76) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SWSSF (76) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as DTEAF (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSSF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as DTEAF (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSSF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as DTEAF (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.

DTEAF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SWSSF (100) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTEAFSWSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRCR0.04N/A
+3.10%
Dear Cashmere Holding Co.
NNGRY33.910.16
+0.49%
NN Group NV
CEJOF9.41N/A
N/A
Cresco Ltd.
CHYI0.12N/A
N/A
CHYKINGYOUNG INVT DEV HLDGS INC.
FPAFY4.29-0.06
-1.38%
First Pacific Company Ltd.

DTEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTEAF and PRRFY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTEAF and PRRFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTEAF
1D Price
Change %
DTEAF100%
-3.78%
PRRFY - DTEAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWSSF - DTEAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFVN - DTEAF
10%
Poorly correlated
-10.03%
SMPL - DTEAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
NOMD - DTEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More

SWSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWSSF has been loosely correlated with PRRFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWSSF jumps, then PRRFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWSSF
1D Price
Change %
SWSSF100%
N/A
PRRFY - SWSSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DTEAF - SWSSF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.78%
SHVTF - SWSSF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYY - SWSSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
TATYF - SWSSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More