DTEAF vs SMPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTEAF is a Hold and SMPL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DTEAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DTEAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SMPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SMPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SMPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DTEAF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +15.52% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
DTEAF is expected to report earnings on Dec 18, 2024.
SMPL is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.58% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| DTEAF | SMPL | DTEAF / SMPL | |
| Capitalization | 11.2M | 3.4B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 234M | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.422 | 0.354 | -1,251% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 26.07 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 1.25B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 121M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 272M | - |
DTEAF | SMPL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DTEAF's Valuation (76) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (89) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DTEAF (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's SMR Rating (76) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DTEAF (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.
DTEAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (46) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DTEAF (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.
| SMPL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
DTEAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DTEAF and PRRFY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTEAF and PRRFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DTEAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTEAF | 100% | +12.61% | ||
| PRRFY - DTEAF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SWSSF - DTEAF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LFVN - DTEAF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| SMPL - DTEAF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| NOMD - DTEAF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
SMPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with INGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then INGR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMPL | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| INGR - SMPL | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| MDLZ - SMPL | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FLO - SMPL | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| CAG - SMPL | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| HSY - SMPL | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||