DTCWY
Price
$13.50
Change
+$0.76 (+5.97%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
9.98B
GMGSF
Price
$22.50
Change
+$0.52 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
25.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTCWY vs GMGSF

Header iconDTCWY vs GMGSF Comparison
Open Charts DTCWY vs GMGSFBanner chart's image
Deutsche Wohnen SE
Price$13.50
Change+$0.76 (+5.97%)
Volume$812
Capitalization9.98B
Goodman Group Sydney NSW
Price$22.50
Change+$0.52 (+2.37%)
Volume$102
Capitalization25.93B
DTCWY vs GMGSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTCWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTCWY vs. GMGSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTCWY is a Hold and GMGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DTCWY: $13.50)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTCWY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • DTCWY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTCWY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMGSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTCWY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GMGSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMGSF is a better buy in the short-term than DTCWY.

Price Growth

DTCWY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMGSF($25.9B) has a higher market cap than DTCWY($9.98B). GMGSF has higher P/E ratio than DTCWY: GMGSF (15.13) vs DTCWY (5.41). DTCWY YTD gains are higher at: 11.677 vs. GMGSF (-0.662). GMGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.97B vs. DTCWY (-353.3M). GMGSF has higher revenues than DTCWY: GMGSF (2.05B) vs DTCWY (1.08B).
DTCWYGMGSFDTCWY / GMGSF
Capitalization9.98B25.9B39%
EBITDA-353.3M2.97B-12%
Gain YTD11.677-0.662-1,763%
P/E Ratio5.4115.1336%
Revenue1.08B2.05B53%
Total CashN/A1.78B-
Total DebtN/A2.99B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTCWY vs GMGSF: Fundamental Ratings
DTCWY
GMGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
9398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTCWY's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMGSF (99). This means that DTCWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GMGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DTCWY (100). This means that GMGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DTCWY’s over the last 12 months.

DTCWY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GMGSF (98). This means that DTCWY’s stock grew similarly to GMGSF’s over the last 12 months.

DTCWY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GMGSF (49). This means that DTCWY’s stock grew similarly to GMGSF’s over the last 12 months.

DTCWY's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GMGSF (99). This means that DTCWY’s stock grew similarly to GMGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTCWYGMGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTCWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTB202.582.52
+1.26%
M&T Bank Corp
EXFY2.520.03
+1.20%
Expensify
POWI59.540.37
+0.63%
Power Integrations
VTOL34.220.18
+0.53%
Bristow Group
MTEX9.20-0.05
-0.54%
Mannatech

DTCWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DTCWY has been loosely correlated with DWHHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DTCWY jumps, then DWHHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTCWY
1D Price
Change %
DTCWY100%
N/A
DWHHF - DTCWY
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SGD - DTCWY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
SVAUF - DTCWY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWK - DTCWY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
OPAD - DTCWY
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.84%
More

GMGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMGSF and VGPBF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMGSF and VGPBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMGSF
1D Price
Change %
GMGSF100%
N/A
VGPBF - GMGSF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYPY - GMGSF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
GRNNF - GMGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTCWY - GMGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DWHHF - GMGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More