DTARF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.12M
GMVMF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
19.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTARF vs GMVMF

Header iconDTARF vs GMVMF Comparison
Open Charts DTARF vs GMVMFBanner chart's image
Delta Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$39.5K
Capitalization14.12M
GMV Minerals
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$98.43K
Capitalization19.98M
DTARF vs GMVMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTARF vs. GMVMF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTARF is a Hold and GMVMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DTARF: $0.10 vs. GMVMF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: DTARF and GMVMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTARF: 69% vs. GMVMF: 131%
Market capitalization -- DTARF: $14.12M vs. GMVMF: $19.98M
DTARF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $14.12M. GMVMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $19.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTARF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGMVMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTARF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GMVMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMVMF is a better buy in the long-term than DTARF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTARF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMVMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTARF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GMVMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMVMF is a better buy in the short-term than DTARF.

Price Growth

DTARF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.92% price change this week, while GMVMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +20.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4955.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMVMF($20M) has a higher market cap than DTARF($14.1M). GMVMF YTD gains are higher at: 212.460 vs. DTARF (15.639). GMVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -610.17K vs. DTARF (-6.61M). DTARF has more cash in the bank: 3.87M vs. GMVMF (31.9K). DTARF (0) and GMVMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DTARFGMVMFDTARF / GMVMF
Capitalization14.1M20M71%
EBITDA-6.61M-610.17K1,083%
Gain YTD15.639212.4607%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.87M31.9K12,122%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTARF vs GMVMF: Fundamental Ratings
DTARF
GMVMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3078
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMVMF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DTARF (88). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (100). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVMF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (99). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (38). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

DTARF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GMVMF (100). This means that DTARF’s stock grew similarly to GMVMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTARFGMVMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNLHN32.991.79
+5.74%
Connecticut Light & Power Co. (The)
EXSR115.003.00
+2.68%
Exchange Bank (Santa Rosa, CA)
ACCFF2.41N/A
N/A
Accord Financial Corp.
CCLLF57.78N/A
N/A
CCL Industries Inc.
XTEPY78.42N/A
N/A
Xtep International Holdings Ltd.

DTARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTARF and KLKLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTARF and KLKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTARF
1D Price
Change %
DTARF100%
-0.94%
KLKLF - DTARF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
GMVMF - DTARF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
GLBKF - DTARF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNGXF - DTARF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLNS - DTARF
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A

GMVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMVMF and MAIFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMVMF and MAIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMVMF
1D Price
Change %
GMVMF100%
-0.01%
MAIFF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
NESRF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
IEGCF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.01%
DTARF - GMVMF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
GLNS - GMVMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More