DTARF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.01M
GLNS
Price
$1.05
Change
+$0.30 (+40.00%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTARF vs GLNS

Header iconDTARF vs GLNS Comparison
Open Charts DTARF vs GLNSBanner chart's image
Delta Resources
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$9K
Capitalization15.01M
Golden Star Resource
Price$1.05
Change+$0.30 (+40.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.42M
DTARF vs GLNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTARF vs. GLNS commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTARF is a Hold and GLNS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (DTARF: $0.11 vs. GLNS: $1.05)
Brand notoriety: DTARF and GLNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTARF: 12% vs. GLNS: 73%
Market capitalization -- DTARF: $15.01M vs. GLNS: $7.42M
DTARF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.01M. GLNS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTARF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLNS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DTARF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLNS is a better buy in the long-term than DTARF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTARF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLNS’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTARF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLNS’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DTARF and GLNS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DTARF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.23% price change this week, while GLNS (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6005.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.48% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTARF($15M) has a higher market cap than GLNS($7.42M). DTARF YTD gains are higher at: 24.543 vs. GLNS (-8.696). GLNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -64.25K vs. DTARF (-5.55M). DTARF has more cash in the bank: 2.62M vs. GLNS (5). DTARF (0) and GLNS (0) have equivalent revenues.
DTARFGLNSDTARF / GLNS
Capitalization15M7.42M202%
EBITDA-5.55M-64.25K8,639%
Gain YTD24.543-8.696-282%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.62M552,380,000%
Total DebtN/A704K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTARF vs GLNS: Fundamental Ratings
DTARF
GLNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8437
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLNS's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DTARF (89). This means that GLNS’s stock grew significantly faster than DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

GLNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (100). This means that GLNS’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

GLNS's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (100). This means that GLNS’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

GLNS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (39). This means that GLNS’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

DTARF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLNS (100). This means that DTARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTARFGLNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVX159.181.76
+1.12%
Chevron Corp
IDA128.430.64
+0.50%
IDACORP
NVCR12.84-0.16
-1.23%
NovoCure Limited
IPWR5.42-0.15
-2.69%
Ideal Power
GDC5.67-0.17
-2.91%
GD Culture Group Limited

DTARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTARF and KLKLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTARF and KLKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTARF
1D Price
Change %
DTARF100%
-5.84%
KLKLF - DTARF
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.57%
GMVMF - DTARF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
GLBKF - DTARF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNGXF - DTARF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-20.00%
GLNS - DTARF
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A

GLNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLNS and KSTBF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLNS and KSTBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNS
1D Price
Change %
GLNS100%
N/A
KSTBF - GLNS
29%
Poorly correlated
-15.38%
VGZ - GLNS
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
SNGCF - GLNS
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.47%
RGLD - GLNS
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
GMVMF - GLNS
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
More