DTARF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
22.7M
GLGDF
Price
$1.06
Change
-$0.08 (-7.02%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
298.17M
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DTARF vs GLGDF

Header iconDTARF vs GLGDF Comparison
Open Charts DTARF vs GLGDFBanner chart's image
Delta Resources
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization22.7M
GoGold Resources
Price$1.06
Change-$0.08 (-7.02%)
Volume$148.39K
Capitalization298.17M
DTARF vs GLGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTARF vs. GLGDF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTARF is a Hold and GLGDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (DTARF: $0.12 vs. GLGDF: $1.06)
Brand notoriety: DTARF and GLGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTARF: 1% vs. GLGDF: 115%
Market capitalization -- DTARF: $22.7M vs. GLGDF: $298.17M
DTARF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.7M. GLGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $298.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTARF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DTARF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the long-term than DTARF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

DTARF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.49% price change this week, while GLGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLGDF($298M) has a higher market cap than DTARF($22.7M). GLGDF YTD gains are higher at: 38.850 vs. DTARF (31.938). GLGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.76M vs. DTARF (-4.35M). GLGDF has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. DTARF (2.41M). DTARF has less debt than GLGDF: DTARF (30K) vs GLGDF (778K). GLGDF has higher revenues than DTARF: GLGDF (28.6M) vs DTARF (0).
DTARFGLGDFDTARF / GLGDF
Capitalization22.7M298M8%
EBITDA-4.35M-3.76M116%
Gain YTD31.93838.85082%
P/E RatioN/A769.23-
Revenue028.6M-
Total Cash2.41M88.8M3%
Total Debt30K778K4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTARF vs GLGDF: Fundamental Ratings
DTARF
GLGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8829
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
9990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7313
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTARF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (93). This means that DTARF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (99). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

DTARF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (41). This means that DTARF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DTARF (73). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

DTARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTARF and KLKLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTARF and KLKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTARF
1D Price
Change %
DTARF100%
N/A
KLKLF - DTARF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
GLGDF - DTARF
19%
Poorly correlated
-6.82%
GMVMF - DTARF
13%
Poorly correlated
-10.19%
GLBKF - DTARF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMDMF - DTARF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with SSVFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then SSVFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
-6.82%
SSVFF - GLGDF
42%
Loosely correlated
-9.41%
ISVLF - GLGDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.15%
DSVSF - GLGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.59%
MAIFF - GLGDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
STPGF - GLGDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
More