DT
Price
$50.00
Change
+$0.23 (+0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
15.08B
52 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$83.68
Change
+$0.89 (+1.08%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
25.04B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DT vs ZM

Header iconDT vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts DT vs ZMBanner chart's image
Dynatrace
Price$50.00
Change+$0.23 (+0.46%)
Volume$3.71M
Capitalization15.08B
Zoom Communications
Price$83.68
Change+$0.89 (+1.08%)
Volume$2.87M
Capitalization25.04B
DT vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DT vs. ZM commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DT is a Hold and ZM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DT: $50.00 vs. ZM: $83.68)
Brand notoriety: DT: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DT: 124% vs. ZM: 81%
Market capitalization -- DT: $15.08B vs. ZM: $25.04B
DT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $15.08B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $309.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the long-term than DT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DT is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

DT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.19% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

DT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($25B) has a higher market cap than DT($15.1B). DT has higher P/E ratio than ZM: DT (30.86) vs ZM (22.02). ZM YTD gains are higher at: 2.536 vs. DT (-8.004). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 983M vs. DT (240M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 7.79B vs. DT (1.35B). ZM has less debt than DT: ZM (61.5M) vs DT (87.7M). ZM has higher revenues than DT: ZM (4.7B) vs DT (1.78B).
DTZMDT / ZM
Capitalization15.1B25B60%
EBITDA240M983M24%
Gain YTD-8.0042.536-316%
P/E Ratio30.8622.02140%
Revenue1.78B4.7B38%
Total Cash1.35B7.79B17%
Total Debt87.7M61.5M143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DT vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
DT
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
4462
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6147
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9862
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZM's Valuation (71) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as DT (72) in the null industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to DT’s over the last 12 months.

DT's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as ZM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that DT’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

DT's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ZM (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that DT’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as DT (61) in the null industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to DT’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DT (98) in the null industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNA43.090.60
+1.41%
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF
FSBD47.910.37
+0.79%
Fidelity Sustainable Core Plus Bond ETF
JPME109.110.33
+0.30%
JPMorgan Divers Ret US Mid Cp Eq ETF
PGP8.490.02
+0.23%
PIMCO Global StockPLUS & Income Fund
SPBU26.88-0.09
-0.33%
AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allc ETF

DT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DT has been closely correlated with DDOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DT jumps, then DDOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DT
1D Price
Change %
DT100%
+0.46%
DDOG - DT
68%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
NOW - DT
67%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
CRM - DT
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
FTNT - DT
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
TEAM - DT
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
+1.08%
PCOR - ZM
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
HUBS - ZM
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
PATH - ZM
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.90%
DT - ZM
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
DOCU - ZM
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.75%
More