DT
Price
$46.24
Change
-$0.63 (-1.34%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
13.94B
80 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$449.72
Change
-$12.15 (-2.63%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
23.7B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DT vs HUBS

Header iconDT vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts DT vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Dynatrace
Price$46.24
Change-$0.63 (-1.34%)
Volume$4.42M
Capitalization13.94B
HUBSPOT
Price$449.72
Change-$12.15 (-2.63%)
Volume$1.29M
Capitalization23.7B
DT vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DT vs. HUBS commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DT is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (DT: $46.24 vs. HUBS: $449.72)
Brand notoriety: DT and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DT: 159% vs. HUBS: 150%
Market capitalization -- DT: $13.94B vs. HUBS: $23.7B
DT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $13.94B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $23.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $344.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DT is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than DT.

Price Growth

DT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.45% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

DT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.46% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($23.7B) has a higher market cap than DT($13.9B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than DT: HUBS (7023.44) vs DT (28.54). DT YTD gains are higher at: -14.922 vs. HUBS (-35.456). DT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 228M vs. HUBS (119M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. DT (1.11B). DT has less debt than HUBS: DT (75.4M) vs HUBS (655M). HUBS has higher revenues than DT: HUBS (2.72B) vs DT (1.7B).
DTHUBSDT / HUBS
Capitalization13.9B23.7B59%
EBITDA228M119M192%
Gain YTD-14.922-35.45642%
P/E Ratio28.547023.440%
Revenue1.7B2.72B62%
Total Cash1.11B2.04B54%
Total Debt75.4M655M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DT vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
DT
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6360
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8669
SMR RATING
1..100
4491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8189
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9877
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DT's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that DT’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as DT (86) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to DT’s over the last 12 months.

DT's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that DT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

DT's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (89) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that DT’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as DT (98) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to DT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMF129.470.71
+0.55%
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
TBX28.310.08
+0.30%
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
RZG50.960.10
+0.20%
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Gr ETF
EBND21.21N/A
N/A
SPDR® Blmbg Em Mkts Lcl Bd ETF
LIAU230.98N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF

DT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DT has been loosely correlated with DDOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DT jumps, then DDOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DT
1D Price
Change %
DT100%
-1.34%
DDOG - DT
64%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
FTNT - DT
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
CRM - DT
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
HUBS - DT
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
ADSK - DT
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-2.63%
CRM - HUBS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
TEAM - HUBS
68%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
NOW - HUBS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
CRWD - HUBS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More