DSVSF
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.04 (-7.84%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
MMRGF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

DSVSF vs MMRGF

Header iconDSVSF vs MMRGF Comparison
Open Charts DSVSF vs MMRGFBanner chart's image
Discovery Silver
Price$0.47
Change-$0.04 (-7.84%)
Volume$87.03K
CapitalizationN/A
Minaurum Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$142.68K
CapitalizationN/A
DSVSF vs MMRGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DSVSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DSVSF vs. MMRGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSVSF is a Hold and MMRGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (DSVSF: $0.47 vs. MMRGF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: DSVSF and MMRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DSVSF: 42% vs. MMRGF: 76%
Market capitalization -- DSVSF: $217.97M vs. MMRGF: $37.34M
DSVSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $217.97M. MMRGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $37.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DSVSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DSVSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSVSF is a better buy in the long-term than MMRGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DSVSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMRGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DSVSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MMRGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMRGF is a better buy in the short-term than DSVSF.

Price Growth

DSVSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -25.44% price change this week, while MMRGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -26.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DSVSF($218M) has a higher market cap than MMRGF($37.3M). DSVSF YTD gains are higher at: -18.171 vs. MMRGF (-24.833). MMRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.45M vs. DSVSF (-31.5M). DSVSF has more cash in the bank: 37.7M vs. MMRGF (2.44M). MMRGF has less debt than DSVSF: MMRGF (83.8K) vs DSVSF (531K). DSVSF (0) and MMRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DSVSFMMRGFDSVSF / MMRGF
Capitalization218M37.3M584%
EBITDA-31.5M-8.45M373%
Gain YTD-18.171-24.83373%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash37.7M2.44M1,546%
Total Debt531K83.8K634%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSVSF vs MMRGF: Fundamental Ratings
DSVSF
MMRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
573
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8081
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSVSF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (62). This means that DSVSF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

DSVSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (100). This means that DSVSF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

DSVSF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (97). This means that DSVSF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

DSVSF's Price Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (81). This means that DSVSF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

DSVSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (100). This means that DSVSF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DSVSFMMRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DSVSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

DSVSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DSVSF has been loosely correlated with ISVLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DSVSF jumps, then ISVLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSVSF
1D Price
Change %
DSVSF100%
-7.27%
ISVLF - DSVSF
49%
Loosely correlated
-7.13%
LGDTF - DSVSF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
MAIFF - DSVSF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
DOLLF - DSVSF
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.19%
SSVRF - DSVSF
44%
Loosely correlated
-6.93%
More

MMRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMRGF has been loosely correlated with SSVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMRGF jumps, then SSVRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMRGF
1D Price
Change %
MMRGF100%
-5.98%
SSVRF - MMRGF
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.93%
DSVSF - MMRGF
37%
Loosely correlated
-7.27%
KOOYF - MMRGF
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
OCGSF - MMRGF
32%
Poorly correlated
-10.70%
ISVLF - MMRGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-7.13%
More