Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMZX vs FSSNX
DSMZX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DSMZX vs FSSNX
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Z
Price$9.83
Change+$0.07 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.38M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
DSMZX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMZX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMZX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. DSMZX (657M). DSMZX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: DSMZX (2.27) vs FSSNX (0.92). DSMZX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DSMZX (7 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DSMZX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DSMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DSMZX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. DSMZX (-0.77). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. DSMZX (11.32).
| DSMZX | FSSNX | DSMZX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.03 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.077 | 2.204 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 25.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 0.92 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | 3.28 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | 31.42 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.32 | 60.96 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.15 | - |