Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMLX vs RGEBX
DSMLX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts DSMLX vs RGEBX
Touchstone Large Company Growth Instl
Price$67.55
Change+$0.35 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.84M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
DSMLX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMLX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMLX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. DSMLX (174M). DSMLX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . DSMLX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: DSMLX (16 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than DSMLX (0.89). DSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DSMLX: RGEBX (250) vs DSMLX (500000). DSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.00 vs. RGEBX (16.90). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.14 vs. DSMLX (35.05).
| DSMLX | RGEBX | DSMLX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.09 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.09 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.782 | 13.004 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.00 | 16.90 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.56 | 55.95 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.05 | 45.14 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.12 | 78.81 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement