Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMLX vs RGACX
DSMLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts DSMLX vs RGACX
Touchstone Large Company Growth Instl
Price$67.34
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
DSMLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMLX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMLX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. DSMLX (172M). RGACX pays higher dividends than DSMLX: RGACX (0.07) vs DSMLX (0.00). DSMLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: DSMLX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than DSMLX (0.89). DSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DSMLX: RGACX (250) vs DSMLX (500000). DSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.23 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. DSMLX (22.06).
| DSMLX | RGACX | DSMLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.94 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.94 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.023 | 17.655 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.23 | 11.01 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.95 | 70.57 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.06 | 37.85 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.87 | 96.78 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement