Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMLX vs GFACX
DSMLX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts DSMLX vs GFACX
Touchstone Large Company Growth Instl
Price$63.41
Change-$1.28 (-1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.03M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.33
Change-$0.74 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
DSMLX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMLX vs. GFACX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMLX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. DSMLX (165M). DSMLX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . DSMLX was incepted earlier than GFACX: DSMLX (16 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than DSMLX (0.86). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. DSMLX (30.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DSMLX: GFACX (250) vs DSMLX (500000). DSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. GFACX (6.90). DSMLX return over 5 years is better than : 29.25 vs. GFACX (10.69).
| DSMLX | GFACX | DSMLX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.35 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.35 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.107 | 1.530 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 6.90 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.60 | 47.58 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.25 | 10.69 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.19 | 95.34 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers