Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMLX vs GFACX
DSMLX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts DSMLX vs GFACX
Touchstone Large Company Growth Instl
Price$66.67
Change-$0.20 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.02M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.63
Change+$0.32 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
DSMLX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMLX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMLX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. DSMLX (171M). DSMLX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . DSMLX was incepted earlier than GFACX: DSMLX (16 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than DSMLX (0.89). DSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DSMLX: GFACX (250) vs DSMLX (500000). DSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.70 vs. GFACX (4.93). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. DSMLX (18.70).
| DSMLX | GFACX | DSMLX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.36 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.36 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.593 | 18.115 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.70 | 4.93 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.04 | 54.70 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.70 | 23.08 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.53 | 74.33 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement