Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMLX vs GFACX
DSMLX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts DSMLX vs GFACX
Touchstone Large Company Growth Instl
Price$61.18
Change-$7.99 (-11.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.32M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.57
Change-$9.33 (-12.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
DSMLX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMLX vs. GFACX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMLX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. DSMLX (159M). DSMLX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . DSMLX was incepted earlier than GFACX: DSMLX (16 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than DSMLX (0.86). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. DSMLX (30.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DSMLX: GFACX (250) vs DSMLX (500000). DSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.82 vs. GFACX (0.14). DSMLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.04 vs. GFACX (4.02).
| DSMLX | GFACX | DSMLX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.35 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.35 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.585 | -1.085 | 423% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.82 | 0.14 | 2,086% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.44 | 36.22 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.04 | 4.02 | 375% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.77 | 93.69 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers