DSITF
Price
$1.67
Change
+$0.01 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
777.23M
FKRAF
Price
$16.50
Change
+$0.70 (+4.43%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DSITF vs FKRAF

Header iconDSITF vs FKRAF Comparison
Open Charts DSITF vs FKRAFBanner chart's image
CURRYS
Price$1.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.60%)
Volume$11.1K
Capitalization777.23M
Fiskars OY AKT
Price$16.50
Change+$0.70 (+4.43%)
Volume$431
Capitalization1.44B
DSITF vs FKRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DSITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DSITF vs. FKRAF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSITF is a Hold and FKRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (DSITF: $1.67 vs. FKRAF: $16.50)
Brand notoriety: DSITF and FKRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DSITF: 58% vs. FKRAF: 95%
Market capitalization -- DSITF: $777.23M vs. FKRAF: $1.44B
DSITF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $777.23M. FKRAF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DSITF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFKRAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DSITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FKRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKRAF is a better buy in the long-term than DSITF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DSITF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKRAF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DSITF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FKRAF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKRAF is a better buy in the short-term than DSITF.

Price Growth

DSITF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FKRAF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKRAF($1.45B) has a higher market cap than DSITF($777M). FKRAF has higher P/E ratio than DSITF: FKRAF (18.35) vs DSITF (12.94). DSITF YTD gains are higher at: 41.525 vs. FKRAF (6.452). FKRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164M vs. DSITF (-35M). DSITF has more cash in the bank: 138M vs. FKRAF (42M). FKRAF has less debt than DSITF: FKRAF (384M) vs DSITF (1.48B). DSITF has higher revenues than FKRAF: DSITF (9.83B) vs FKRAF (1.14B).
DSITFFKRAFDSITF / FKRAF
Capitalization777M1.45B54%
EBITDA-35M164M-21%
Gain YTD41.5256.452644%
P/E Ratio12.9418.3571%
Revenue9.83B1.14B862%
Total Cash138M42M329%
Total Debt1.48B384M385%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSITF vs FKRAF: Fundamental Ratings
DSITF
FKRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6266
SMR RATING
1..100
6988
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
843
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKRAF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as DSITF (13). This means that FKRAF’s stock grew similarly to DSITF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FKRAF (66). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to FKRAF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FKRAF (88). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to FKRAF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FKRAF (58). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to FKRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FKRAF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DSITF (84). This means that FKRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than DSITF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DSITFFKRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DSITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGIVX16.070.15
+0.97%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 5
USPRX77.150.40
+0.52%
Victory 500 Index Reward
DVRPX17.180.06
+0.35%
UBS US Dividend Ruler P2
IICHX11.380.04
+0.35%
AMF Large Cap Equity H
IEDZX13.710.03
+0.22%
Voya Large Cap Value R6

DSITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSITF and IHCPF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSITF and IHCPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSITF
1D Price
Change %
DSITF100%
N/A
IHCPF - DSITF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - DSITF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - DSITF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
FKRAF - DSITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - DSITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FKRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FKRAF has been loosely correlated with BWMX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FKRAF jumps, then BWMX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKRAF
1D Price
Change %
FKRAF100%
N/A
BWMX - FKRAF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
SDA - FKRAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - FKRAF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - FKRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
CZASF - FKRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More