DSEEY
Price
$6.61
Change
+$0.03 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
8 days until earnings call
GS
Price
$644.30
Change
+$11.57 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jan 23, 02:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
134.2B
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DSEEY vs GS

Header iconDSEEY vs GS Comparison
Open Charts DSEEY vs GSBanner chart's image
Daiwa Securities Group
Price$6.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
Volume$3.74K
Capitalization7.95B
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$644.30
Change+$11.57 (+1.83%)
Volume$800
Capitalization134.2B
DSEEY vs GS Comparison Chart
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DSEEY vs. GS commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSEEY is a Hold and GS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (DSEEY: $6.58 vs. GS: $634.74)
Brand notoriety: DSEEY: Not notable vs. GS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DSEEY: 86% vs. GS: 236%
Market capitalization -- DSEEY: $7.95B vs. GS: $134.2B
DSEEY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $7.95B. GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $134.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DSEEY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DSEEY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DSEEY and GS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

DSEEY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.97% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +11.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

DSEEY is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.44% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than DSEEY($7.95B). GS (18.08) and DSEEY (17.39) have similar P/E ratio . GS YTD gains are higher at: 10.848 vs. DSEEY (-0.454). GS has less debt than DSEEY: GS (333B) vs DSEEY (16.85T). DSEEY has higher revenues than GS: DSEEY (571B) vs GS (46.3B).
DSEEYGSDSEEY / GS
Capitalization7.95B134B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.45410.848-4%
P/E Ratio17.3918.0896%
Revenue571B46.3B1,233%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt16.85T333B5,059%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSEEY vs GS: Fundamental Ratings
DSEEY
GS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
305
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
577
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSEEY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (96) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that DSEEY’s stock grew significantly faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as DSEEY (30) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as GS (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that DSEEY’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSEEY (57) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as DSEEY (92) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

DSEEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSEEY and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSEEY and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSEEY
1D Price
Change %
DSEEY100%
-2.66%
JPXGY - DSEEY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
NMR - DSEEY
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
MS - DSEEY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
GS - DSEEY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
SF - DSEEY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
More

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
+1.41%
SF - GS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
PIPR - GS
76%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
EVR - GS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
MS - GS
75%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
MC - GS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
More