It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DSCSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIQEPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DSCSY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IQEPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DSCSY (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -4.39% price change this week, while IQEPF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.86%.
The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
DSCSY | IQEPF | DSCSY / IQEPF | |
Capitalization | 29.9B | 124M | 24,113% |
EBITDA | 164B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 4.065 | 13.060 | 31% |
P/E Ratio | 35.73 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 360B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 244B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
DSCSY | IQEPF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DSCSY's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IQEPF (93). This means that DSCSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IQEPF’s over the last 12 months.
DSCSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IQEPF (100). This means that DSCSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IQEPF’s over the last 12 months.
DSCSY's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IQEPF (95). This means that DSCSY’s stock grew significantly faster than IQEPF’s over the last 12 months.
IQEPF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as DSCSY (52). This means that IQEPF’s stock grew similarly to DSCSY’s over the last 12 months.
IQEPF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DSCSY (84). This means that IQEPF’s stock grew significantly faster than DSCSY’s over the last 12 months.
DSCSY | IQEPF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago81% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago64% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DSCSY has been loosely correlated with ATEYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DSCSY jumps, then ATEYY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DSCSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DSCSY | 100% | +1.95% | ||
ATEYY - DSCSY | 66% Loosely correlated | +5.22% | ||
TOELY - DSCSY | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
RNECY - DSCSY | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
LSRCY - DSCSY | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
TOELF - DSCSY | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IQEPF and NVEC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IQEPF and NVEC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQEPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IQEPF | 100% | N/A | ||
NVEC - IQEPF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
SMTC - IQEPF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
ASMVF - IQEPF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DSCSY - IQEPF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.95% | ||
ASMXF - IQEPF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
More |