Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRUP vs SMH
DRUP vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts DRUP vs SMH
GraniteShares Nasdaq Sel Disruptors ETF
Price$61.63
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$539
Net Assets55.57M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$278.42
Change+$3.22 (+1.17%)
Volume$8.17M
Net Assets25.99B
DRUP vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRUP vs. SMH commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRUP is a StrongBuy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 26B vs. DRUP (55.6M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than DRUP: SMH (14.969) vs DRUP (9.062). DRUP was incepted earlier than SMH: DRUP (6 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than DRUP (0.60). DRUP has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| DRUP | SMH | DRUP / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 9.062 | 14.969 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 55.6M | 26B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.35 | 171% |
| Turnover | 107.00 | 18.00 | 594% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DRUP | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DRUP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRUP has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DRUP jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DRUP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRUP | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| FTV - DRUP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PSTG - DRUP | 70% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| ANET - DRUP | 68% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| ON - DRUP | 66% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| EXPE - DRUP | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||